以积极行政构建商业算法治理的制度体系  

Constructing a Institutional System for Proactive Administration on Business Algorithmic Governance

作　　者：侯泽琦 HOU Ze-qi(School of Law,Beijing Institute of Technology,Beijing 100081,China)

机构地区：[1]北京理工大学法学院,北京100081

出　　处：《哈尔滨工业大学学报（社会科学版）》2024年第4期54-61,共8页Journal of Harbin Institute of Technology(Social Sciences Edition)

基　　金：国家社会科学基金重大项目“互联网平台的社会影响及治理路径研究”(21&ZD195)。

摘　　要：“算法解释”与“算法透明”依然停留在技术治理的层面,而非行为治理。算法商业化应用所造成的生产信息黑箱化,暴露了传统消极行政理念与私法规制体系的局限性,因此须采用积极行政理念赋予政府主导监管体系的合理与合法性。以此为基础,提出算法安全、分级分类、成本效益、精巧规制四大原则。最终以事前算法备案评估、事中公私二元保障的制度体系、事后公益诉讼等一系列制度构建,“夺回”由于“自动化”而丧失的社会生产全流程信息监管权。“Algorithmic interpretation”and“algorithm transparency”remain at the level of technical governance rather than behavioral governance.The commercialization of algorithm applications has led to the opacity of production information,exposing the limitations of traditional negative administrative concepts and private regulatory systems.Therefore,it is necessary toadopt a proactive administrative concept to empowerthe government-led regulatory system with rationality and legitimacy.Based on this,four principles of algorithm security,hierarchical classification,cost-effectiveness and sophisticated regulation are proposed,along with a three-dimensional regulatory model of strong regulation,open self-regulation and public participation.Through the establishment of a system including pre-algorithm filing assessments,a dual guarantee system in the middle,and public interest litigation in the post-stage,the regulatory power over the entire process of social production information,which has been lost due to“automation”,can be“reclaimed”.

关 键 词：算法解释 算法评估 积极行政 公益诉讼 

分 类 号：D922.16[政治法律—宪法学与行政法学]