检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:诸竹君 黄先海[2] 陈航宇 ZHU Zhujun;HUANG Xianhai;CHEN Hangyu(Modern Business Research Center&School of Economics,Zhejiang Gongshang University;School of Economics,Zhejiang University;Research Center for Regional Coordinated Development&China Open Economy,Zhejiang University)
机构地区:[1]浙江工商大学现代商贸研究中心,浙江杭州310018 [2]浙江大学经济学院,浙江杭州310018 [3]浙江大学区域协调发展研究中心/中国开放型经济研究中心,浙江杭州310018
出 处:《金融研究》2024年第2期76-93,共18页Journal of Financial Research
基 金:国家社会科学基金项目(23&ZD085,22&ZD162,22AJL010);国家自然科学基金面上项目(72173117);浙江省社会科学基金项目(23QNYC11ZD,22ZJQN21YB)的资助。
摘 要:发展新质生产力,需要促进生产性服务业与制造业深度融合。本文扩展了Foster et al.(2008)模型,从供给侧、需求侧和一般均衡条件下,揭示上游生产性服务业外资开放对下游制造业创新行为的作用机制。实证研究发现:(1)总体上,生产性服务业外资开放,显著提升了中国制造业企业专利创新数量、质量和效率;(2)机理方面,生产性服务业外资开放,对下游制造业创新行为存在正向的成本节约效应和偏好互补效应、负向的竞争加剧效应,净效应取决于正负效应之和。生产性服务业外资开放对下游制造业创新作用程度呈现U形曲线关系,正向创新效应存在开放度“门槛值”;(3)政策方面,加快通信、商务和科技等知识密集型服务业外资开放,提升制造业企业技术水平和管理效率,优化地区市场化程度,促进边境外措施和边境内措施协同互补,有利于更好发挥正向创新效应。本文对扩大生产性服务业外资开放,促进中国制造业创新,发展新质生产力,具有一定参考意义。The development of new quality productivity requires promoting the deep integration of productive services with manufacturing.A report of the 20th National Congress of the Communist Party of China proposes to increase the opening of the modern service industry and promote its deep integration with advanced manufacturing.Overall,the proportion of knowledge-intensive business services(KIBS)is increasing,and the proportion of productive services represented by KIBS will continue to increase steadily.Currently,a conspicuous shift from real to virtual productive services is ongoing,and the positive effect of productive services on manufacturing is decreasing.The level of coordinated development between productive services and manufacturing is low.Promoting the deep integration of productive services with manufacturing will enhance China's high-quality development.Whether upstream productive services can promote innovative behavior in downstream manufacturing serves as the micro basis for testing this macro proposition.Improving the levels of integration and development between productive services and manufacturing and cultivating new forces to drive growth through service innovation are currently hot topics in academic and policy circles.This paper theoretically extends Foster et al.'s(2008)benchmark model by introducing innovation behavior and the upstream opening of foreign investment in productive services.It reveals the mechanism of innovation behavior in downstream manufacturing from the supply side and demand side and under general equilibrium conditions.According to a comparative static analysis,the impact of opening foreign investment in productive services on manufacturing innovation yields a U-shaped curve.Specifically,the opening of knowledge-intensive services affects the innovation behavior of downstream manufacturing firms through a cost-saving effect,a preference complementarity effect,and a competition intensification effect,while the opening of transportation services affects the innovation behavior o
关 键 词:生产性服务业外资开放 创新行为 产业链关联
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.12.34.36