论互联网平台治理的元规制进路  

Meta-regulation of Internet Platform

作　　者：黄文艺[1] 孙喆玥 HUANG Wenyi;SUN Zheyue

机构地区：[1]中国人民大学法学院 [2]吉林大学法学院

出　　处：《法学评论》2024年第4期111-122,共12页Law Review

基　　金：2022年度教育部哲学社会科学研究重大专项项目“坚持建设中国特色社会主义法治体系,深入推进全面依法治国实践研究”(项目编号:2022JZDZ002)的阶段性成果。

摘　　要：元规制理论既尊重互联网平台自我规制的首要性、主导性地位,又倡导以政府再规制来弥补或消解互联网平台自我规制的缺陷,为解决互联网平台治理难题提供了可行的制度范式和操作方案。互联网平台元规制应以互联网平台的准立法权、准行政权、准司法权、数字私权力的规制为实施路径,坚持多主体协同规制,尽可能形成强大共治合力;坚持私权利保障与公共利益保护并重,尽可能实现社会福利最大化;坚持预防性规制优先,尽可能将平台风险防患于未然;坚持包容审慎规制、外部激励约束,尽可能激发平台自治能力和创新活力。Meta-regulation theory not only respects the primacy and dominance of Internet platform self-regulation,but also advocates government re-regulation to make up for or dissolve the defects of Internet platform self-regulation,which provides a feasible institutional paradigm and operational program for solving the Internet platform governance problems.Internet platform meta-regulation should take the quasi-legislative,quasi-executive,quasi-judicial,and digital private power regulation of the Internet platform as the implementation path,adhere to the synergistic regulation of multiple main bodies,and form a strong co-governance synergy as far as possible;adhere to the protection of private rights and the protection of the public interest,and realize the maximization of social welfare as far as possible;adhere to the priority of preventive regulation,and prevent the platform risk as far as possible;and adhere to the tolerant and prudent regulation,external incentives and constraints,and stimulate the platform's autonomy and innovative vitality as much as possible.

关 键 词：互联网平台 元规制 自我规制 政府规制 

分 类 号：D922.16[政治法律—宪法学与行政法学] D922.294[政治法律—法学]