博物馆非同质化权证数字藏品开发的现实基础、内生风险及规制路径  

The Practical Foundation,Intrinsic Risks,and Regulatory Pathways for the Development of Non-Fungible Token(NFT)Digital Collections in Museums

作　　者：付丽霞[1] 何羽丽 FU Li-xia;HE Yu-li(Center for Studies of Intellectual Property Rights,Zhongnan University of Economics and Law,Wuhan,Hubei,430073)

机构地区：[1]中南财经政法大学知识产权研究中心,湖北武汉430073

出　　处：《东南文化》2024年第3期170-177,共8页Southeast Culture

基　　金：中国博物馆协会科研课题资助计划“博物馆藏品数字化的知识产权问题研究”(TCMA-2022-1.6-QN-2)。

摘　　要：数字时代,博物馆开发非同质化权证(NFT)数字藏品的新文创形式应运而生,在为博物馆带来新发展机遇的同时也使其面临较大挑战。为了实现公共利益与私人利益的平衡,并契合藏品自身的公共产品性质,应当明确赋予博物馆利用文物资源铸造并发行NFT数字藏品的权利。然而在开发过程中,区块链技术的不稳定性潜藏着数据安全风险,NFT数字藏品较低的创新程度要求易诱发同质化现象,且NFT自身的代币性质也会产生金融风险。有鉴于此,博物馆应当明确NFT数字藏品开发的内部合规方向,厘清角色定位,坚持以创新为原则,加强风险预警工作;同时,应进一步完善外部监管机制,建立相应的市场标准与备案机制,并做好法律监管工作。In the digital age,the non-fungible tokens(NFTs)digital collection has emerged as a new form of cultural innovation in museums,offering significant opportunities along with considerable challenges.To balance public and private interests and conform to public goods nature of museum collections,museums should be granted rights to produce NFT products using their collections.However,blockchain technology's instability presents data risks,the lack of innovation can lead to homogenization,and the token nature of NFTs introduces financial risks.Therefore,museums must establish clear internal compliance guidelines for NFT digital collections development,define their roles,adhere to principles of innovation,and enhance rick prevention mechanisms.Additionally,external regulatory mechanisms need improvement,including establishing market standards and filling systems,as well as strengthening legal supervision.

关 键 词：博物馆 非同质化权证(NFT) 数字藏品 利益平衡 公共产品 

分 类 号：G260[历史地理—考古学及博物馆学]