检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:孔令勇 刘子乐 KONG Lingyong;LIU Zile
机构地区:[1]安徽大学法学院
出 处:《浙江警察学院学报》2024年第3期42-55,共14页Journal of Zhejiang Police College
基 金:2021年国家社会科学基金青年项目“企业合规视野下企业认罪认罚从宽制度构建及适用研究”(21CFX071)。
摘 要:“委派调解+司法确认”纠纷解决机制是深化诉源治理的重要举措。其切合诉源治理以“治理”为本质,以诉“源”预防为要义;符合诉源治理司法便民与司法利民的基础理念以及接近正义与寻求和谐的价值理念;契合诉源治理的多元纠纷解决路径与坚持法律规则、原则基础上的社会规范化解纠纷多元化方法。但囿于非讼程序理论与司法确认程序的不适配性,司法确认程序申请条件缺乏合理性以及人民法院对“委派调解+司法确认”纠纷解决机制支持力度不够等问题,该机制的纠纷解决功能受限。应从规范司法确认程序证据提交及证明标准,明确司法确认最低限度程序保障,确保委派调解协议与司法确认程序及时、有效衔接,完善委派调解制度的激励机制与惩戒机制等方面对该机制进行完善。需要正确认识到,调解并非当然为诉讼的前置程序,在具体选择适用时人民法院须从当事人切身利益出发,坚持“以人民为中心”理念。The dispute resolution mechanism of"Delegated Mediation+Judicial Confirmation"is an important measure to deepen litigation source management.It aligns with the essence of litigation source management,which focuses on"management",and prioritizes the prevention of litigation""sources";it conforms to the foundational concepts of judicial convenience for the people and benefiting the people through justice,as well as the value concepts of approaching justice and seeking harmony;it matches the diverse dispute resolution paths of litigation source management and adheres to the diversified methods of social standardization in resolving disputes based on legal rules and principles.However,due to the mismatch between non-litigation procedure theory and judicial confirmation procedures,the lack of rationality in the application conditions for judicial confirmation procedures,and the insufficient support from the People's Courts for the"Delegated Mediation+Judicial Confirmation"dispute resolution mechanism,its dispute resolution function is limited.It should be improved by standardizing the evidence submission and proof standards for judicial confirmation procedures,clarifying the minimum procedural guarantees for judicial confirmation,ensuring the timely and effective connection between delegated mediation agreements and judicial confirmation procedures,and perfecting the incentive and punishment mechanisms of the delegated mediation system.Requiring a correct understanding that mediation is not necessarily a prerequisite for litigation.When selecting its application,the People's Court must start from the actual interests of the parties involved and adhere to the"people-centered"concept.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.142.43.53