检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:陈如超[1] CHEN Ruchao
出 处:《公安学研究》2024年第2期19-39,123,共22页Journal of Public Security Science
基 金:重庆市科学技术局2022年度重点项目“电信网络诈骗犯罪侦防关键技术研究”(CSTB2022TIAD-KPX0107)。
摘 要:电信网络诈骗犯罪司法治理的制度逻辑,在纵向层面,经历了简约治理向专门治理的制度转型;在横向层面,体现为严厉惩罚、全链条打击与简化证明。然而,电信网络诈骗犯罪司法治理的制度逻辑及其实效之间始终存在较大落差。两者背离的主要原因,在于不断迭代更新的电信网络诈骗犯罪,一方面突破了传统犯罪的组织形态与行为模式,另一方面改变了传统案件的证据结构与事实结构,这就导致在回应传统犯罪基础上逐渐演变且趋于稳定保守的司法治理模式,难以避免制度缺失、制度滞后、制度抽象与制度冲突等结构性的制度短缺问题。此外,电信网络诈骗犯罪司法治理的制度实效,还同时受制于制度体制与制度资源。因此,刑事司法治理电信网络诈骗犯罪,应当采取体系化、前瞻性、整体性的立法回应模式。On a vertical sense,the institutional logic of judicial governance for cyber-telecom fraud has undergone a transformation from simple governance to specialized governance;on a horizontal sense,it is manifested in aspects such as severe punishment,full-chain crackdown,and simplified proof.However,there is a significant gap between the institutional logic and actual effectiveness.This is because evolving cyber-telecom fraud crimes are strikingly different from traditional crimes in terms of organizational forms and behavioral patterns,and have changed the evidence structure and factual structure of traditional cases.This leads to an inevitable structural shortage of institutional deficiencies,lag,abstraction,and conflicts.In addition,the actual effects of judicial governance of cyber-telecom fraud crimes are constrained by institutional system and resources.Therefore,a systematic,forward-looking,and holistic legislative response model should be adopted.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.249