寻衅滋事罪:功能、问题与改造  

The Crime of Picking Quarrels and Provoking Trouble:Functions,Problems and Modification

作　　者：敦宁 DUN Ning

机构地区：[1]大连海事大学法学院,大连116026

出　　处：《公安学研究》2024年第2期85-102,124,共19页Journal of Public Security Science

基　　金：国家社会科学基金项目“预防型犯罪的法治体系构造研究”(19BFX068)。

摘　　要：在刑事立法活性化时代,对寻衅滋事罪的“口袋化”等问题应谋求立法层面的解决方式。寻衅滋事罪包含多种行为类型,客观上具有对相关犯罪的立法补充功能,因而不宜直接废止。但该罪也存在保护法益不明、罪状用语模糊、行为类型狭窄、法定刑趋重等诸多立法缺陷,并由此带来一系列实践问题。这些立法缺陷的产生,在根本上是源于早期以行为人类型设置流氓罪的不当做法。鉴此,相应的立法改革措施就是以行为所侵犯的具体法益为导向,对该罪进行类型化和轻罪化的改造。其中,对于侵犯财产和秩序法益的行为,可与相关犯罪进行类型整合,并进行必要的立法完善;对于侵犯人身法益的行为,可按照类型化要求,分别设置为“暴行罪”“恐吓罪”“滋扰罪”三种轻罪。In the era of the activation of criminal law legislation,legislative approaches to problems such as“pocketization”of the crime of picking quarrels and provoking troubles should be adopted.The crime includes a variety of different types of acts,and objectively has the function of legislative supplement to related crimes,so it is not appropriate to be directly abolished.However,it also has a number of legislative shortcomings,such as unclear protection of legal interests,vague wording of the crime,narrow types of behavior,and heavy legal penalties,which have brought about a series of practical problems.They are fundamentally rooted in the earlier inappropriate practice of setting up the crime of hooliganism by type of actor.In view of this,the corresponding legislative reform measures are to reform the type and the misdemeanor of this crime based on the specific legal interest violated by the act.Among them,legislative improvements may be made by integrating the crime of infringement on the legal interests of property and order with related crimes.The crime of infringement on the personal legal interests should be divided into three misdemeanors:“atrocity crime”,“intimidation crime”and“nuisance crimes”

关 键 词：寻衅滋事罪 补充功能 立法缺陷 类型化 轻罪化 

分 类 号：D914.04[政治法律—刑法学]