两岸关系中南海问题的法律战展开:一种话语权的分析  

Unfolding of the Lawfare over the South China Sea Issue in the Cross-Strait Relations:An Analysis of the Right of Discourse

作　　者：叶正国[1] 黎超康 Ye Zhengguo;Li Chaokang(China Institute of Boundary and Oceanology,Wuhan University)

机构地区：[1]武汉大学中国边界与海洋研究院

出　　处：《台海研究》2024年第2期61-69,共9页Cross-Taiwan Strait Studies

基　　金：国家社会科学基金一般项目“提升对美推动台湾问题‘国际化’的法理斗争能力研究”(项目编号:22BGJOB)。

摘　　要：在话语权争夺的视野下,两岸关系中的南海问题法律战是一个重要的议题。由于共同政治基础的缺失,两岸在南海问题上很容易进行独白式的话语生产,这在一定程度上形塑了国际社会和中国台湾地区民众对两岸关系的法律认知。中国台湾当局逐渐从话语框架的对立化、话语基础的事实化和话语策略的具体化等方面重构了一套“去中国化”的法律论述,试图回避或绕开传统基于历史、地理、法律和事实的中国叙事逻辑。对此,中国内地在南海问题上要适时通过完善法律制度、扩大法律实践和优化法律叙事,来掌握“一中南海”论述的主动权主导权。The lawfare over cross-Strait relations in the South China Sea issue is an important topic from the perspective of discourse competition.Due to the lack of a common political foundation,it’s easy to produce monologue-style discourses across the Strait,which to a certain extent shapes the legal perceptions,among the international community and the residents in the Taiwan region,China,of cross-Strait relations.The Taiwan region authorities have gradually developed a set of legal discourses featuring“De-Sinicization”in terms of the confrontation of discourse frameworks,the factualization of discourse foundations,and the concreteness of discourse strategies to avoid or bypass the traditional Chinese narrative logics based on history,geography,law,and facts.In this regard,Chinese mainland must pay attention to the construction of discourse and grasp the right to speak of“both sides of the Taiwan Strait belonging to one China”by perfecting the legal system,expanding the actual jurisdiction,and optimizing the legal narrative on the South China Sea issue at an appropriate time.

关 键 词：南海问题 法律战 “去中国化” 话语权 

分 类 号：D922.6[政治法律—环境与资源保护法学] D675.8[政治法律—法学] D993.5