城市社区去行政化改革的事物、职能和组织维度  

Urban Community De-Administration Reform: Dimensions of Affairs, Functions, and Organization

作　　者：陈建国[1] 范子怡 CHEN Jianguo;FAN Ziyi(School of Humanities and Social Sciences,North China Electric Power University,Beijing 102206,China)

机构地区：[1]华北电力大学人文与社会科学学院,北京102206

出　　处：《西安交通大学学报（社会科学版）》2024年第4期122-131,共10页Journal of Xi'an Jiaotong University：Social Sciences

基　　金：北京市哲学社会科学规划重点项目(18GLA001);中央高校基本科研业务费哲学社会科学繁荣计划专项项目(2021FR001)。

摘　　要：近年来,去行政化一直是基层治理改革的主题。部分地方政府探索了“居站分设”“撤街强社”等模式,但由于缺乏综合性,单一线索的改革难免陷入困境。现有文献从国家社会关系和社区职能分类等视角探索去行政化改革,但由于未能全面纳入社区治理的影响因素,因而和社区治理实践存在一定的脱节。在利用事物、职能和组织逻辑的框架透视改革历程后发现,缺乏彼此配合的单一逻辑改革效果有限。住房制度改革和物业服务的市场化开辟了行政控制外的新空间,却面临业主组织支撑力度不强的难题。职能分类和准入制为社区去行政化提供了前提,但缺少组织关系改革的配合,行政性事项仍然会渗透组织边界进入居民委员会。居站分离改革为去行政化提供了组织依托,但由于缺乏系统性思维而出现了分殊。三重逻辑框架和对改革历程的分析启示,未来的去行政化要避免单一逻辑的事物职能改革或者组织改革,坚持“事物职能分类、居站分离和培育居民自治”三策并举的复合型改革,继续梳理制定社区事物职能分类目录,结合目录清单改革城市的社区居站关系,聚焦相关利益和治理环节培育居民委员会自治能力。In recent years, de-administration has been the basic approach in grassroots social governance reform. Some local governments have innovatively explored models such as “ the separation between residents’ committee and community service station” “removing streets management to strengthen communities’ management,” “admission system of administrative affairs,” and “the linkage of communities, social organizations and social workers.” However, due to a lack of comprehensiveness, reforms based on a single thread often inevitably fall into predicaments. Existing literature mainly focuses on discussing de-administration reform from the perspectives of state-society relations, urban community residents’ committees, and classification of community affairs. These discussions have not effectively aligned with the complex systemic challenges faced by urban community de-administration reform.This article proposes a systematic framework for analyzing the de-administration reform of communities from a composite perspective of “affairs, functions, and organizations.” Guided by this framework, it conducts a thorough examination and reflection on housing system reform and property management practices, community access systems, community burden reduction reforms, and the separation of residents’ committee and the community service station. It finds that the effects of reforms based on a single logic lacking mutual coordination are limited. The marketization of housing system reforms and property services has opened up new spaces for communities to go beyond administrative control, yet it faces the challenge of weak support from homeowner organizations. While functional classification and access systems provide a basis for the de-administration of communities, without the coordination of organizational relationship reforms, administrative matters still penetrate organizational boundaries and enter the residents’ committees. The separation of residents’ committee and community service station provides

关 键 词：城市社区 去行政化 基层治理 事物职能 组织逻辑 复合型改革 

分 类 号：D669.3[政治法律—政治学] D630[政治法律—中外政治制度]