帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪的司法实践问题  

Judicial Practice of the Crime of Aiding Information Network Criminal Activities

作　　者：王志刚 徐亚琼 WANG Zhigang;XU Yaqiong(School of Cyber Security and Information Law,Chongqing University of Posts and Telecommunications,Nan’an Chongqing,400065,China)

机构地区：[1]重庆邮电大学网络空间安全与信息法学院,重庆南岸区400065

出　　处：《西南石油大学学报（社会科学版）》2024年第4期63-74,共12页Journal of Southwest Petroleum University(Social Sciences Edition)

基　　金：研究阐释党的十九届四中全会精神国家社科基金重大项目“建立健全网络综合治理体系研究”(20ZDA062)。

摘　　要：帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪自2015年入刑后,近年来在司法实务中被大量认定。学界认为此举有违刑法的谦抑性。通过整理100个样本案例,分析司法实践中的“重罪行为轻罚化”以及“过度扩张”两种观点,发现该罪在具体适用时存在“明知”的认定不明确、与掩饰和隐瞒犯罪所得罪认定存在争议、刑罚的适用标准不统一等问题。当前,为了有效治理信息网络犯罪,应从明确“明知”的认定、正确区分该罪与掩饰和隐瞒犯罪所得罪、统一刑罚适用标准等方面入手,确保帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪实现应有的治理效果。After the crime of aiding information network criminal activities was listed in the Criminal Law in 2015,many court rulings have been made in judicial practice.Scholars hold that such rulings are against the principle of necessity of criminal law.Based on 100 sample cases,the two views of“light punishment for felony”and“excessive expansion”about the rulings in practice are analyzed,and we found that in practice,the determination of“knowingly”is not clear,there is a dispute over the determination of the crime of concealing illegal gaining,and that the applicable standards of criminal punishment are not unified.In this regard,we make targeted suggestions making efforts for clear definition of“knowingly”,for distinguishing this crime from the crime of concealing illegal gaining,and for unified standards for the application of criminal punishments,so as to achieve effective governance of relevant cybercrimes.

关 键 词：帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪 重罪行为轻罚化 网络犯罪 司法实践 刑法谦抑性 

分 类 号：D924.3[政治法律—刑法学]