检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:肖阳 薛影 张帅帅 梁寿衡 XIAO Yang;XUE Ying;ZHANG Shuai-shuai;LIANG Shou-heng(Medical Ultrasound Center,Northwest Women and Children's Hospital,Xi'an 710038,Shaanxi Province,China;Department of Radiology,Tangdu Hospital,Air Force Medical University,Xi'an 710038,Shaanxi Province,China)
机构地区:[1]西北妇女儿童医院医学超声中心 [2]空军军医大学唐都医院放射科,陕西西安710038
出 处:《中国CT和MRI杂志》2024年第7期153-155,共3页Chinese Journal of CT and MRI
摘 要:目的评价经腹壁超声和螺旋CT平扫对输尿管微小结石检出的诊断价值。方法回顾分析我院近三年172例急性肾绞痛患者的经腹壁超声和螺旋CT影像资料,比较两种方法对输尿管微小结石检出率是否存在差异,并评价两种方法诊断一致性。结果172例急性肾绞痛患者平均年龄为42.3±14.2(岁)。61例(36.1%)位于上段,30例(17.7%)位于中段,78例(46.2%)位于下段。下段结石直径分别与上段和中段结石直径存在统计学差异(P<0.05)。5mm常规CT平扫诊断准确率、漏诊率和误诊率分别为93.0%、5.2%和1.8%,显著优于经腹壁超声的诊断准确率(45.9%)、漏诊率(45.3%)和误诊率(8.8%)。螺旋CT平扫和经腹壁超声检查诊断输尿管微小结石的一致性差。经腹壁超声的输尿管各段微小结石检出率显著低于CT平扫(P<0.05)。超声检出组输尿管微小结石直径显著大于和未检出组(P<0.05)。结论经腹壁超声的输尿管微小结石检出率低,当初筛发现输尿管扩张时,应用螺旋CT平扫诊断效果更好。Objective To evaluate the diagnostic value of transabdominal ultrasound and spiral CT plain scan in detecting small ureteral calculi.Methods The imaging data of 172 patients with acute Renal colic diagnosed and treated in our hospital in the past three years were retrospectively analyzed by transabdominal ultrasound and spiral CT.The difference in the detection rate of ureteral microlithiasis between the two methods was compared,and the diagnostic consistency of the two methods was evaluated.Results The average age of 172 patients with acute Renal colic was 42.3±14.2 years old.61 cases(36.1%)were located in the upper segment,30 cases(17.7%)in the middle segment,and 78 cases(46.2%)in the lower segment.There was a statistical difference in the diameter of the lower segment stones compared to the upper and middle segments stones(P<0.05).The diagnostic accuracy,missed diagnosis rate,and misdiagnosis rate of 5mm conventional CT plain scan were 93.0%,5.2%,and 1.8%,respectively,significantly superior to the diagnostic accuracy(45.9%),missed diagnosis rate(45.3%),and misdiagnosis rate(8.8%)of transabdominal ultrasound.The consistency between spiral CT plain scan and transabdominal ultrasound examination in diagnosing small ureteral stones is poor(Kappa=0.35).The detection rate of small stones in various segments of the ureter by transabdominal ultrasound was significantly lower than that by CT plain scan(P<0.05).The diameter of small ureteral stones in the ultrasound detection group was significantly larger than that in the non detection group(P<0.05).Conclusion The detection rate of small ureteral stones by transabdominal ultrasound is low,and when ureteral dilation was first detected through screening,spiral CT plain scan has a better diagnostic effect.
分 类 号:R445.1[医药卫生—影像医学与核医学] R445.4[医药卫生—诊断学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.117.135.125