检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:王进文 WANG Jinwen
出 处:《南京农业大学学报(社会科学版)》2024年第4期39-51,共13页Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University(Social Sciences Edition)
基 金:国家社会科学基金一般项目“党建引领农村共同富裕协同治理机制研究”(23BDJ011);河海大学中央高校基本科研业务费青年教师项目“共同富裕背景下新型农村集体经济发展研究”(B240207012)。
摘 要:步入新阶段,新型农村集体经济已成为促进乡村共同富裕的重要举措。基于山东D村和广东S村两个案例,依照“资源—规则—效能”分析框架,探讨新型农村集体经济发展带动乡村共同富裕的过程和机理。研究发现,新型农村集体经济由于股权结构、参与方式和分配原则的不同,形成不同取向的内生规则,进而影响乡村共同富裕成效。其中,以集体化股权结构、过程式参与、公有利益分配为特征的社区合作型集体经济,维系了经营过程的集体性和内生规则的公共性,进而提升了乡村共同富裕内生发展能力。而以个体化股权结构、监管式参与、共有利益分配为特征的股份合作型集体经济,偏重于集体经营的经济属性且吸纳了政治动力,致使内生规则的去公共化以及乡村共同富裕的目标偏移。从战略定位来说,集体经济发展不能局限于经济经营的层次,还应着眼于激发集体的政治活力,并由此建构公共性的规则秩序,以便对乡村共同富裕事业施以正向性影响。In the contemporary epoch,the burgeoning new rural collective economy has emerged as a pivotal strategy for fostering communal prosperity within rural domains.This treatise investigates the intrinsic mechanisms through which the new rural collective economy catalyzes rural prosperity,employing the analytical construct of“resources-rules-efficiency.”The study is anchored in the case studies of D village in Shandong and S village in Guangdong,elucidating the nuanced trajectories of collective economic development.The findings indicate that the new rural collective economy gives rise to endogenous regulations of varying orientations,contingent upon the distinct ownership structures,modes of participation,and principles of distribution,which in turn,exert influence on the efficacy of rural prosperity.Notably,the community cooperative collective economy,distinguished by a collectivized ownership structure,processual participation,and a distributional ethos anchored in public interest,preserves the collective nature of the management process and the transparency of endogenous regulations,thereby enhancing the endogenous capacities for rural prosperity.Conversely,the stock cooperative collective economy,characterized by an individualized ownership structure,supervised participation,and a distributive principle of shared benefits,concentrates on the economic attributes of collective management while incorporating political power,leading to the erosion of the public character of endogenous regulations and the deviation from the goal of rural communal prosperity.From a strategic standpoint,the progression of the collective economy should transcend the mere sphere of economic operation,necessitating an emphasis on animating the political vitality of the collective.This approach is imperative for constructing a public rule order that can exert a constructive impact on rural communal prosperity.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.13