检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:刁胜先 吴乐 DIAO Shengxian;WU Le(School of Cyberspace Security and Information Law,Chongqing University of Posts and Telecommunications,Chongqing 400065,China)
机构地区:[1]重庆邮电大学网络空间安全与信息法学院,重庆400065
出 处:《重庆科技大学学报(社会科学版)》2024年第4期44-54,共11页Journal of Chongqing university of science and technology(social sciences edition)
基 金:广西哲学社会科学规划课题“区域经济发展视域下广西数据要素市场培育的法律问题研究”(21BFX003)。
摘 要:数字经济时代,围绕企业数据保护的具体制度设计存在两种主要争议:一是认为围绕物权制度进行设计;二是认为以知识产权制度为基础来构建。但数据的无形性、信息属性等特性,以及激励创新性数据挖掘的目的,让数据天然地更适合知识产权保护模式。因此,首先明确企业数据的界定现状及特征,探究其内在特征和保护偏好;其次比较分析企业数据与知识产权保护客体之间的异同,从理论上证成其知识产权保护路径的正当性和可行性;最后明确实践中企业数据的知识产权保护困境,并探寻专门的数据知识产权保护路径。In the era of digital economy,there are two main controversies regarding the specific institutional design of enterprise data protection:one is designed for the property rights system,and the other for intellectual property system.However,the intangible and informational properties of data,as well as the purpose of stimulating innovative data mining,naturally bring it closer to the mode of intellectual property protection.Therefore,first of all,the definition status and characteristics of enterprise data should be clarified in order to explore its inherent characteristics and protection preferences.Secondly,compare and analyze the similarities and differences between enterprise data and intellectual property protection objects,and theoretically prove the legitimacy and feasibility of their intellectual property protection paths.Finally,based on intellectual property protection dilemma of enterprise data in practice,explore specific paths for data intellectual property protection.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.33