寓理于情:驳案所见“情”与司法制度逻辑  

On Reflection of the Rationality of Judicial System in the Use of“Qing”in Bo an

作　　者：邢天宇 Xing Tianyu

机构地区：[1]中南财经政法大学

出　　处：《南大法学》2024年第4期158-173,共16页NanJing University Law Journal

摘　　要：“情”的使用蕴含了清代重案审判制度的思维模式与权力构造。在驳案的实际运行过程中,根据案情重大疑难与否,参与案件讨论的主体构成会发生变化,也会带来不同的思考方式。同时这种思考方式反映了清代重案审判中蕴含的等差式的权力构造,即“主者守文”“大臣释滞”和“人主权断”的等差式审判权力配比。对上述思维模式与权力构造进行深入考察,有助于进一步理解清代司法的权力运作样态,也可以在“逐级审转复核制”之外提供一种法学的观察视角。The using of“Qing”is the gateway to show the rational system and power constitution in the judiciary of important cases in Qing Dynasty.Whether the case is critical or not determines who will attend the judgment,and the thinking model of those people will be different.Meanwhile,the thinking model unfold the power constitution in judiciary procedure,and that is“Zhu Zhe Shou Wen”“Da Chen Shi Zhi”and“Ren Zhu Quan Duan”.To deeply acknowledge those could make us understand how judiciary in Qing Dynasty works,and widen our horizon from legal angles besides the historical vision.

关 键 词：“情” 个案逻辑 权力分配 清代审判 驳案 

分 类 号：D929[政治法律—法学] K249[历史地理—历史学]