元宇宙诉讼的认知、障碍和建构逻辑  

The Cognition Obstacle and Construction Logic of Metaverse Litigation

作　　者：郑返 穆昌亮 Zheng Fan;Mu Changliang

机构地区：[1]吉林大学法学院,吉林长春130012 [2]广东省社科研究基地城乡文化发展研究中心,广东广州511370 [3]贵州大学法学院,贵州贵阳550000

出　　处：《南海法学》2024年第3期102-116,共15页The South China Sea Law Journal

基　　金：国家社会科学基金项目“民事在线诉讼实证研究”(项目号22CFX065);广东省社科基地——城乡文化发展研究中心课题“数字化诉讼视阈下当事人诉权保障研究”(GYKCS-2023-10)研究成果。

摘　　要：我国现阶段诉讼数智化发展面临着诉讼平台破碎化和数据壁垒化的双重困境,元宇宙技术的体系化和虚拟化特征高度迎合我国打造全系统一体化、全时空泛在化的人民法院信息化4.0版的司法改革需求,通过整合现有数字化技术群,元宇宙诉讼能对现有的数字化司法资源进行再分配,是突破现阶段民事智能司法发展瓶颈和内卷现状的重要契机。在看到元宇宙巨大的潜在诉讼利用价值的同时也需警惕技术至上主义,未来元宇宙诉讼的构建在技术开发上应以司法人员为主导,在设计理念上秉承以人为本的指导思想,应划清人机协同的分工界限,并明确智能司法决策的责任主体以强化对技术的法律约束。Current litigation number intellectual development faces the double dilemma of litigation platform fragmentation and data barriers,metaverse technology systematization and virtualization characteristics highly cater to build system integration,full-time space in the people's court informatization version 4.0 of judicial reform needs,through the integration of the existing digital technology group,metaverse litigation to redistribution of existing digital judicial resources,is a breakthrough in the present civil intelligent judicial development bottleneck and the present situation of the important opportunity.In see the metaverse huge potential litigation utilization value at the same time the universe also need to alert technology supremacy,the future metaverse litigation construction on the technology development should be dominated by judicial personnel,on the design concept of the people-oriented guiding ideology,should delimit the man-machine collaboration,and clear intelligent judicial decision responsibility main body to strengthen the legal constraints of technology.

关 键 词：元宇宙诉讼 人工智能 泛在化 虚拟世界 

分 类 号：D926[政治法律—法学] D925[自动化与计算机技术—计算机应用技术] TP391.9[自动化与计算机技术—计算机科学与技术]