涉数据法律规范的冲突解决——论形式和实质二分法  

Conflict resolution of data-related legal norms:form and substance dichotomy

作　　者：柴雪映 Chai Xueying(School of Law,Shandong University,Qingdao 266200,China)

机构地区：[1]山东大学法学院,山东青岛266200

出　　处：《网络安全与数据治理》2024年第7期77-86,共10页CYBER SECURITY AND DATA GOVERNANCE

摘　　要：目前涉数据法律规范在适用中存在冲突,冲突解决不当导致法律责任归结失衡。判断涉数据法律规范冲突的本质,可将其分为法益侵害单一性的形式冲突和法益侵害多重性的实质冲突。涉数据法律规范冲突解决的前提是:明确《数据安全法》《个人信息保护法》及《网络安全法》保护法益所指涉对象的不同及关联性;厘清法律规范间的关系轮廓。涉数据法律规范的冲突解决方式需要类型化区分形式冲突及实质冲突,形式冲突类比于《刑法》中法条竞合,遵循“特别优先”;实质冲突类比于《刑法》中想象竞合和并罚竞合,遵循“择一重罪处罚”或“并罚”。正确解决涉数据法律规范冲突不仅实现恰当评价涉数据违法行为的目标,也是提升数据生产力的内在要求。At present,there are conflicts in the application of data-related legal norms,and improper resolution of the conflicts leads to the imbalance of legal liability attribution.To judge the nature of the conflict of legal norms related to data,it can be divided into the form conflict of single infringement of legal interests and the substantive conflict of multiple infringement of legal interests.The premise of resolving the conflict of data-related legal norms is to clarify the differences and relevance of the objects involved in the data security law,the personal information protection law and the network security law;Clarify the outline of the relationship between legal norms.The conflict resolution of data-related legal norms needs to be classified into formal conflict and substantive conflict,which is analogous to the concurrence of articles in criminal law and follows the principle of special priority;Substantive conflict is analogous to imaginative concurrence and concurrent punishment concurrence in criminal law,which follows the principle of choosing one heavy or concurrent punishment.Correctly resolving the conflict of data-related legal norms not only achieves the goal of properly evaluating data-related illegal acts,but also is the inherent requirement of improving data productivity.

关 键 词：法律规范冲突 法益 实质冲突 数据 竞合 

分 类 号：D913[政治法律—民商法学]