动产抵押权的追及效力研究——以辽宁辉山乳业公司为例  

Study on the Pursuit and Effect of Chattel Mortgage——Taking Liaoning Huishan Dairy Group as an Example

作　　者：李慧敏 LI Huimin(Law School,Qinghai Minzu University,Xining Qinghai 810007)

机构地区：[1]青海民族大学法学院,青海西宁810007

出　　处：《中国乳业》2024年第7期102-105,110,共5页China Dairy

基　　金：青海民族大学研究生创新项目“动产抵押权的追及效力研究”(04M2024105)。

摘　　要：《民法典》第406条确认了抵押权的追及效力,但第403条动产抵押的登记对抗规则与第404条正常经营买受人规则会对动产抵押权的追及效力产生阻断效力。本文以辽宁辉山乳业集团有限公司三家子公司以未办理抵押登记的动产牛提供抵押为切入点,分析动产抵押权的追及效力的正当性,分析动产抵押权的追及效力在适用中易受阻断的情形与原因,对动产抵押权易受阻断的困境提出方法,破解《民法典》第403条、第404条、第406条之间的冲突。Article 406 of the Civil Code confirms the tracing effect of the mortgage,but the tracing effect of the chattel mortgage is limited by the doctrine of filing antagonism of the chattel mortgage and the normal operation buyer rule of Article 404.This article took the three subsidiaries of Liaoning Huishan Dairy Group as the starting point to analyze the legitimacy of the tracing effect of chattel mortgage,and then analyzed the circumstances and reasons why the tracing effect of chattel mortgage was easily blocked,and proposed a method for the dilemma of the chattel mortgage being easily blocked,which was aimed at solving the conflict between Articles 403,404,and 406 of the Civil Code.

关 键 词：动产抵押 追及效力 登记对抗 正常经营买受人 

分 类 号：D923[政治法律—民商法学]