检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:邢会强[1] Xing Huiqiang
机构地区:[1]中央财经大学法学院
出 处:《东方法学》2024年第4期212-224,共13页Oriental Law
基 金:2023年教育部哲学社会科学研究后期资助项目“证券虚假陈述法律责任研究”(项目批准号:23JHQ072)的阶段性研究成果。
摘 要:当前,证券虚假陈述损害赔偿出现了巨额化现象,导致威慑过度与赔偿不足的双重困境。证券虚假陈述民事赔偿巨额化的深层次原因在于侵权法的过度扩张,凸显了完善证券虚假陈述侵权法律制度的现实需求。要建立健全证券虚假陈述侵权损害赔偿的社会化分散机制,但社会化分散机制是有限的。这些有限的社会化分散机制包括侵权人赔偿梳理、责任保险制度和公平基金制度等。同时,还应适当限缩证券虚假陈述民事法,进一步发挥合同法对特定的专业投资者的救济功能,引入非故意的被告赔偿责任上限制度。Currently,the compensation for damages caused by securities misrepresentation has become increasingly substantial,leading to the dual dilemmas of excessive deterrence and insufficient compensation.The deeper-root reason for the enormous civil compensation in securities misrepresentation lies in the over-expansion of tort law,highlighting the real need to improve the torts system governing securities misrepresentation.There is a need to establish and imporve a sound socialized dispersion mechanism for securities misrepresentation compensation,but such a mechanism is inherently limited.These limited socialized dispersion mechanisms include sorting out infringers,implementing liability insurance systems,and establishing fair fund systems.Additionally,the scope of civil law regarding securities misrepresentation should be appropriately narrowed,further leveraging contract law to provide remedies for specific professional investors.The introduction of a non-intentional system of capping the liability of defendants is also recommended.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.67