清代例文增补的谦抑性——以《大清律例》“强占良家妻女”条为例  

The Legal Restraint in the Supplemental Cases of the Qing Dynasty Legal Restraint in the Supplemental Cases of the Qing Dynasty-Using the Article"Forcible Occupation of Women"from the Laws of the Qing Dynasty as an Example

作　　者：逯子新 LU Zixin(Law School,Anhui Normal University,Wuhu Anhui 241000,China)

机构地区：[1]安徽师范大学法学院,安徽芜湖241000

出　　处：《安徽师范大学学报（社会科学版）》2024年第4期103-109,共7页Journal of Anhui Normal University(Hum.&Soc.Sci.)

基　　金：安徽省哲学社会科学规划青年项目“清代安徽省例研究”(AHSKQ2021D07)。

摘　　要：《大清律例》沿袭我国传统律典的特点,即律条的罪状描述十分具体,对应的刑罚单一确定,因此需要不断增补例文以填补律例的漏洞。但例文的增补并非随意,清代立法者增补例文十分审慎,有着严格的考量标准:一是增补例文的类型性,二是增补的例文对既有刑等体系的补充。然而,立法的谦抑与法律漏洞之间的矛盾始终存在,清代立法者通常借助比附制度,在例文构建的多层结构的罪刑体系之中,比附选择较为适当的罪与刑,以实现量刑的允协。TheLawsoftheQingDynastyfollows the characteristics of China's traditional laws and regulations,wherein the description of theoffenses were very specific,and the corresponding punishment were singular and fixed.There-fore,it was necessary to constantly supplement the code with case examples to fill the loopholes in the laws and regu-lations.However,the addition of articles is not arbitrary.The legislators in the Qing dynasty were very cautious in adding articles,and had strict criteria.The first criteria is the typology of added examples.The second criteria is the supplementation's contribution to the existing penalty system.Nevertheless,the contradiction between the stability of law and the loopholes of law has always existed.The legislators in the Qing dynasty usually used"Bi Fu"to select the most appropriate crimes and punishments in the multi-layered structure of the crime and punishment system,so as to achieve the justice of sentencing.

关 键 词：立法谦抑 强占良家妻女 刑等体系 比附 

分 类 号：D909.9[政治法律—法学理论]