检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:费安玲 喻钊 FEI Anling;YU Zhao(College of Comparative Law,China University of Political Science and Law,Beijing 100088,China)
机构地区:[1]中国政法大学比较法学研究院,北京100088
出 处:《河北大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》2024年第4期116-127,共12页Journal of Hebei University(Philosophy and Social Science)
基 金:中国版权保护中心重大项目“民间文艺版权开发的法律困境与解决路径研究”(BQ2022001)。
摘 要:对人工智能生成内容保护与否、如何保护的争论,本质上是对既有利益如何协调的讨论。化解人工智能生成内容带来的利益冲突,需从人工智能运行的底层逻辑出发,以利益分析为主线,审视著作权法保护的条件。人工智能生成内容符合广义邻接权的保护要求。但现有邻接权制度无法对人工智能生成内容提供保护,邻接权制度需进行一定的扩张,结合人工智能生成内容的特性和关联的利益,宜新设“生成式信息使用者权”,并对权利主体、具体保护条件、权利行使限制等方面进行明确。The debate on whether and how to protect AI-generated content is essentially a discussion of how to harmonize established interests.To resolve the conflict of interests brought about by AI-generated content,it is necessary to start from the underlying logic of the operation of AI,and to examine the conditions of protection under the copyright law with the analysis of interests as the main line.Artificial intelligence-generated content meets the protection requirements of broad neighboring rights.Existing neighboring rights system cannot provide protection for AI-generated content.The system of neighboring rights shall be expanded to a certain extent,and it is appropriate to establish a new“user's right to generate information”,taking into account the characteristics of the content generated by artificial intelligence and the interests associated with it.It needs to be clarified in terms of the subject of the right,the specific conditions of protection,and the limitations on the exercise of the right.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.7