检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张可云[1] 庄宗武 ZHANG Ke-yun;ZHUANG Zong-wu
出 处:《吉林大学社会科学学报》2024年第4期155-171,239,共18页Jilin University Journal Social Sciences Edition
基 金:国家自然科学基金面上项目(72073137);国家自然科学基金青年项目(72003190)。
摘 要:在数字经济发展如火如荼、数字经济政策不断出台的现实背景下,中国制造业的就业比重呈现持续下降的态势,因此,厘清数字经济政策能否推进制造业稳就业问题具有重要的理论和现实意义。文章利用城市政府工作报告中的数字经济相关词频占比表征城市的数字经济政策强度,进而考察数字经济政策强度对制造业稳就业的影响及其机制。研究发现,数字经济政策强度的提升既会通过就业创造效应与利润创造效应促进制造业就业,又会通过就业结构转换效应阻碍制造业就业,但正向影响大于负向影响,因而数字经济可以作为目前中国制造业稳就业的抓手。解构数字经济政策的进一步分析发现,数字产品制造、数字产品服务与数字要素驱动政策强度的提升显著促进了制造业就业,其余各类数字经济政策则未产生明显影响。此外,数字经济政策助力制造业稳就业并不是以降低制造业就业质量为代价的。研究结论不仅有助于正确认识数字经济对制造业稳就业的积极作用,还能够为提前制定相关政策、保持制造业比重基本稳定提供有益启示。Under the realistic background of the rapid development of digital economy and the continuous introduction of related policies,the employment proportion of China’s manufacturing industry continues to decline.Therefore,it is of important theoretical and practical value to clarify whether digital economic policies can promote stable employment in manufacturing industry.This paper uses the frequency proportion of words related with digital economy in the government work report to describe the city’s digital economy policy intensity,and then examines the influence and its mechanism of digital economy policy intensity on the stable employment of manufacturing industry.It is found that while the improvement of the intensity of digital economic policy will promote the stable employment of manufacturing industry through the effect of employment creation and profit creation,it nevertheless can also hinder the stable employment through the transformation effect of employment structure,but the positive impact is greater than the negative one.Therefore digital economy can be used as an effective means for stable employment in China’s manufacturing industry.Based on the further analysis of the deconstruction of digital economic policy intensity,it is found that the increase of digital product manufacturing,digital product service and digital factor-driven policy intensity has significantly promoted the stable employment of the manufacturing industry,while other kinds of digital economic policy intensity has not had a significant impact.In addition,the digital economic policy helping the manufacturing industry to stabilize employment is not at the expense of reducing the quality of manufacturing employment.The findings of this paper not only help to clarify the debate whether the digital economy can promote stable employment in the manufacturing industry,but also provide useful inspiration for formulating relevant policies in advance and keeping the proportion of the manufacturing industry basically stable.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.222.108.223