检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:许春梅[1] Xu Chunmei
机构地区:[1]中国社会科学院世界宗教研究所,北京100005
出 处:《西藏研究》2024年第3期58-65,M0005,共9页Tibetan Studies
摘 要:古印度宗教宗派林立,彼此之间的各种学说和思想长期处于并行传播、相互竞争、相互影响的状态。各宗派皆标榜自己掌握了真理,但如何证明,真理标准为何一直困扰着因明师们。在陈那之前的几百年里,古因明学家们给出了一个衡量标准,但并不可靠。直到陈那,这个问题才真正得到解决,这也奠定了陈那在因明史上的地位与贡献。There were many different sects in ancient India that were spreading,competing,and influencing one another simultaneously.How can anyone prove they have mastered the truth,even though they all say they do?Exist dependable criteria to support this claim?The wise teachers are troubled by this issue.Prior to Dignaga,a measurement system known as“Pancavayava”was in use,but it was unreliable.Dign ga was the one who solved the problem entirely.Additionally,the work proved Dignaga’s place and significance in Hetuvidy history.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.191.28.129