《明纪编年》与朝鲜英祖朝经筵  

MingJiBianNian and the Jingyan in Yingzu of Joseon Dynasty

作　　者：袁昆仑 李裴蕾 Yuan Kunlun;Li Peilei(School of History and Culture,Liaoning Normal University,Dalian 116081,China)

机构地区：[1]辽宁师范大学历史文化学院,辽宁大连116081

出　　处：《辽宁师范大学学报（社会科学版）》2024年第4期138-144,共7页Journal of Liaoning Normal University(Social Science Edition)

基　　金：辽宁省社会科学基金一般项目“东亚视野下的朝鲜王朝经筵讲史研究”(L23BSS001)。

摘　　要：《明纪编年》十二卷,题钟惺撰、王汝南续补,或是假托钟惺之作。《明纪编年》在清初被刊刻后,获得广泛传播。乾隆帝修《四库全书》时,《明纪编年》遭到禁毁。该书传入朝鲜王朝后,成为肃宗和英祖时期的经筵教材。尤其英祖时期,君臣于经筵中研读和讨论《明纪编年》,内容包括选贤任能和改革弊政、阐述为君之道、讨论朝鲜王朝弊端和评价崇祯君臣等,目的是以史为鉴。《明纪编年》在中朝之间影响的差异是当时中朝不同政治状况的反映。There are 12 volumes of the MingJiBianNian . It is said to have been written by Zhong Xing and supplemented by Wang Runan. In fact, the book is a fake in the name of Zhong Xing. After being published in the early Qing Dynasty, it was widely disseminated. The book was banned and destroyed during the compilation of SiKuQuanShu in QianLong’s reign. The book was introduced into the Joseon Dynasty along with the exchange of China and Joseon Dynasty, and became a textbook for the Jingyan in Suzong and Yingzu. Especially in the period of Yingzu, the King and his ministers discussed in the Jingyan, including taking the death of the Ming Dynasty as a warning, select the wise and capable persons as officials and reform of corrupt politics, discussing the way of being the king and the disadvantages of the Joseon Dynasty, evaluating Chongzhen and his ministers, with the purpose of learning from history. The difference in the influence of the MingJiBianNian between China and Joseon Dynasty is a reflection of the different political conditions of China and Joseon Dynasty at that time.

关 键 词：《明纪编年》 朝鲜王朝 经筵 中朝史学交流 

分 类 号：K248[历史地理—历史学] K312.3[历史地理—中国史]