检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:杨须爱 王果 YANG Xu'ai;WANG Guo
机构地区:[1]中央民族大学民族学与社会学学院,北京100081
出 处:《西北民族研究》2024年第3期5-19,共15页Journal of Northwestern Ethnic Studies
基 金:国家社会科学基金重大项目“坚持正确的中华民族历史观研究”(编号:22&ZD210)的阶段性成果。
摘 要:“赞米亚”是申德尔为研究跨区域山地社会历史而首创的学术概念。斯科特借用这一概念,但将其内涵引申为“逃避统治的非国家空间”,进而将这一概念建构成具有方法论意义、分析国家边缘空间社会历史的学说,遂在学界扩散开来。文章在追溯“赞米亚”概念、学说产生与传播过程的基础上,对东西方学界关于“赞米亚”学说是与非问题的讨论作了述评,着重对该学说的旨趣与谬误作了分析,进而剖析与反思了学界目前在“赞米亚”学术史研究中存在的主要问题。“Zomia”originally introduced by Schende as an academic concept for examining the historical and social progression of trans-regional mountain communities,was later adopted and expanded by Scott to encompass the idea of“non-state spaces of escape from domination”,thus establishing it as a theoretical framework for analyzing peripheral state societies,subsequently gaining traction within the academic community.This paper provides a comprehensive analysis of the origin,dissemination,and scholarly discourse surrounding the concept and theory of“Zomia”in both Eastern and Western academic circles.It critically examines Scott's theory of“Zomia”,focusing on its essential goal and fallacies,while also addressing the prevailing issues within current research on the academic history of“Zomia”.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.145.36.157