倪思宽《文选》学发覆  

A Review of Ni Sikuan′s WenXuan

作　　者：王忠杰 WANG Zhongjie(School of Literature and communication,Quanzhou Normal University,Quanzhou 362000,China)

机构地区：[1]泉州师范学院文学与传播学院,福建泉州362000

出　　处：《东华理工大学学报（社会科学版）》2024年第3期271-278,共8页Journal of East China University of Technology(Social Science)

基　　金：国家社科基金重大项目“历代别集编纂及其文学观念研究”(21&ZD254)。

摘　　要：清中叶学者倪思宽著有《文选音义订正》八卷,本书虽已佚失,但他平生所作《二初斋读书记》中存有与《文选》相关的考评札记,藉此可以考察其《文选》学路径与意旨。倪思宽的《文选》学研究补充旧注,辨析讹误,尝试“由音及义”法,展现了其以实学为根植的考订特色;评点兼《文选》文本及旧注,旁通天文地理,采用抽绎互证之方法,体现了实学深度。倪思宽强调古文创作“实而铺写”及“出之简练”,在崇尚求实精神之时,也加深了《文选》学与文章学的互动。校读《文选》所据用的版本并非善本,以及校改有误断之弊,是倪思宽《文选》学研究的局限与不足。Ni Sikuan,an WenXuan researcher in the early Qing Dynasty,wrote eight volumes of The Phonological and Semantic Revision of WenXuan.Although they have been lost,there are evaluation notes related to WenXuan in his book Er Chu Zhai Reading Notes,which can be used to investigate the path and intention of WenXuan.Ni Sikuan attached great importance to the textual research of WenXuan and discriminated the old notes,which was quite proved by later generations;Try the method of"from sound to meaning"to be the precursor of"seeking meaning from sound".In terms of comments,he abandoned the disadvantage of rootless talk in the Ming Dynasty,which is closely related to his commitment to practical learning.The study of WenXuan by Ni Sikuan embodies the characteristics of the transition from comment to textual criticism in the study of WenXuan in the early Qing Dynasty.It not only updates our cognition of the realistic spirit of the study of WenXuan in the early Qing Dynasty,but also shows its interactive relationship with the study of articles.Of course,the edition on which Ni′s school read WenXuan has the disadvantage of"recklessness"in the proofreading and correction,which is its limitation.

关 键 词：倪思宽 《文选》 考订 评点 文章学 

分 类 号：I207.22[文学—中国文学]