检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:郑文乐 ZHENG Wenle(Law School,Ningbo University,Ningbo Zhejiang,315211)
出 处:《湖北体育科技》2024年第4期99-105,共7页Hubei Sports Science
摘 要:行政处罚裁量基准是有效规制行政处罚权的重要工具,体育行政处罚裁量权则是行政裁量权在体育法治领域内的具体映射。作为一项新生事物,需要以体育领域为切入视角,研究剖析体育行政处罚裁量基准制度的定位、构造和效力,以利于其在行政法治的框架内发挥效力并完成使命。总体而言,体育行政处罚裁量基准具有裁量性规则和说理性工具的双重定位,在内在构造上表现为要件联结效果的组合,而在外在构造上则是表现形式的不同呈现,并由此产生出主体、客体和内容层面上的法律效力。Administrative penalty discretionary benchmark is an important tool to effectively regulate the administrative penalty,sports administrative penalty discretion is the specific mapping of administrative discretion in the field of sports rule of law.As a new thing,need to take the field of sports as the entry point,study and analyze the positioning of sports administrative penalty discretionary benchmark system,structure and effectiveness,in order to facilitate its administrative rule of law framework to play a role in the effectiveness and fulfill the mission.Generally speaking,the sports administrative punishment discretionary benchmark has the dual position of discretionary rules and rational tools,the inner structure is manifested in the combination of the elements of the linkage effect,while the outer structure is the expression of different forms of presentation,and thus produce the subject,object and content of the three levels of legal effect.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.49