基于文献计量学的人因可靠性分析方法对比研究  

Comparative Study on Human Reliability Analysis Methods Based on Bibliometrics

作　　者：施梦洁 张人友 李冉 张丹宸 Shi Mengjie;Zhang Renyou;Li Ran;Zhang Danchen(Beijing Institute of Petrochemical Technology,Beijing,102617;Beijing Police College,Beijing,102202)

机构地区：[1]北京石油化工学院,北京102617 [2]北京警察学院,北京102202

出　　处：《安全、健康和环境》2024年第7期1-8,共8页Safety Health & Environment

基　　金：北京市教委科技计划项目(KM202210017002),人机交互视角下的高校科研实验风险评估与溯源研究;北京市大学生科研训练项目(2024J00068),高校学生实验室安全意识的多维精准评估研究。

摘　　要：当前学者对人因可靠性分析方法进行了大量有效应用与改进,以评估人在复杂系统中的操作效率、可靠性和安全性。然而,在众多人因可靠性分析方法中选择适合的分析方法,需要开展对比研究。因此,通过查阅CNKI中国知网资源,选取CREAM、HEART、SLIM、SPAR-H、THERP这5种常用的人因可靠性分析方法,基于文献计量学开展对比分析,以量化呈现各人因可靠性分析方法的使用领域和趋势。结果显示,5种人因可靠性分析方法的选择排序为CREAM>HEART>THERP>SLIM>SPAR-H,即CREAM为使用度相对较高的评价方法。本研究得出的人因可靠性分析方法排序能为未来人因可靠性分析方法在各个领域的选取和应用提供有效参考及指导。Currently,scholars have extensively applied and improved human reliability analysis methods to evaluate the operational efficiency,reliability,and safety of humans in complex systems.However,selecting the appropriate analysis method among numerous human reliability analysis methods requires comparative research.Therefore,by consulting CNKI China Knowledge Infrastructure resources,five commonly used human reliability analysis methods,namely CREAM,HEART,SLIM,SPAR-H,and THERP,were selected for comparative analysis based on bibliometrics to quantitatively present the application areas and trends of each human reliability analysis method.The results showed that the selection ranking of the five human reliability analysis methods was CREAM>HEART>THERP>SLIM>SPAR-H,indicating that CREAM was a relatively high usage evaluation method.The ranking of human reliability analysis methods obtained in this study can provide effective reference and guidance for the selection and application of future human reliability analysis methods in various fields.

关 键 词：人因可靠性分析 文献计量学 CNKI CITESPACE 对比分析 

分 类 号：U283.2[交通运输工程—交通信息工程及控制]