古代赋论的诗学本位  

The Poetic Basis of Ancient Criticisms of Fu

作　　者：易闻晓[1] YI Wenxiao(School of Literature,Guizhou Normal University,Guiyang 550025,China)

机构地区：[1]贵州师范大学文学院,贵州贵阳550025

出　　处：《湖南大学学报（社会科学版）》2024年第4期83-91,共9页Journal of Hunan University(Social Sciences)

基　　金：国家社会科学基金重大项目:历代赋论整理研究(19ZDA249);国家社会科学基金重点项目:赋学通论(18AZW011)。

摘　　要：赋以铺陈,是乃赋体创制的本质要义。宋玉承接屈辞以定赋体,开启汉赋叙物一途,不关《诗》学之旨。但以班固“赋者古诗之流”为代表的汉代赋论本于《诗》学经义,强将楚辞纳入《诗》学流变体系,形成以《诗》论赋的既定传统而影响久远;六朝赋论仍之,强调比兴讽喻;而唐以降赋话援取诗法之例,讲求律赋作法,反映六朝骈赋以至唐代律赋的“诗化”演变与铺陈丧失。凡此表现为古代赋论的诗学本位,在最为基本的观念上有悖赋体创制的本质特点。Fu is characterized with elaboration which is the essence of the creation of Fu.Inheriting Chu Ci by Qu Yuan,Song Yu established the style of Fu and initiated the way of object-description in Han Fu which was unrelated with Shi Jing studies.However,represented by Ban Gu’s view that“Fu is the descendant of ancient poetry”,the Fu criticisms in the Han Dynasty was fundamentally based on the exegetical meanings of Shi Jing which enforced Chu Ci being taken in the evolutionary of Shi Jing studies and formed the far-reaching tradition of critiquing Fu by the standard of Shi Jing.The Fu criticism in the Six Dynasties continued to that trend but emphasized metaphor and allegory.Since the Tang Dynasty,the discussion on Fu took examples by poetry techniques and highlighted the techniques of regulated Fu which reflected the“poetization”evolution from parallel Fu in the Six Dynasties to the regulated Fu in the Tang Dynasty as well as the loss of elaboration.All the above representing Shi Jing studies was fundamental to the ancient Fu criticism which essentially contradicted the elemental characteristics of the creation of the style of Fu.

关 键 词：赋学 赋论 诗经 诗学 古诗之流 

分 类 号：I206.2[文学—中国文学]