功能导向下行政复议的价值取向与完善路径  

Value Orientation and Perfect Path of Administrative Reconsideration under Function Orientation

作　　者：陈书全[1] 张珊 CHEN Shuquan;ZHANG Shan(Law School,Ocean University of China,Qingdao 266100,China)

机构地区：[1]中国海洋大学法学院,山东青岛266100

出　　处：《湖南大学学报（社会科学版）》2024年第4期134-141,共8页Journal of Hunan University(Social Sciences)

基　　金：国家社会科学基金重大项目:构建科学有效的行政权制约监督体系研究(20ZDA106)。

摘　　要：行政复议制度具备解决纠纷、救济权利、内部监督三项功能,其中权利救济体现了行政复议化解行政争议主渠道作用的价值追求,以权利救济为首的多项功能共存,能够有效回应复议制度的实践需求,发挥主渠道作用。主渠道条款作为新行政复议法的立法目的,对具体制度设计具有统筹作用。从整体性视角出发,行政复议制度相比于行政诉讼具有制度性优势,这种优势是发挥行政复议化解行政纠纷的主渠道作用的基础。在制度修订过程中,应当进一步发挥行政复议的制度优势,进一步改革行政复议管辖制度、扩大受案范围、运用信息技术手段增强复议能力。The administrative reconsideration system has three functions:dispute resolution,relief right and internal supervision,among which the right relief reflects the value pursuit of the main channel role of administrative reconsideration in resolving administrative disputes.Multiple functions led by right relief coexist,which can effectively respond to the practical needs of the reconsideration system and play the role of the main channel.As the legislative purpose of the new administrative reconsideration law,the main channel clause plays an overall role in the specific system design.From the perspective of integrity,administrative reconsideration system has institutional advantages compared with administrative litigation,which is the basis for administrative reconsideration to play its role as the main channel in resolving administrative disputes.In the process of system revision,we should further take the advantages of the system of administrative reconsideration,further reform the jurisdiction system of administrative reconsideration,expand the scope of accepting cases,and enhance the ability of reconsideration by means of information technology.

关 键 词：行政复议 权利救济 纠纷解决 行政诉讼 

分 类 号：D922.112[政治法律—宪法学与行政法学]