财产权视域下的马克思与黑格尔关系辨析——以《黑格尔法哲学批判》为中心  

An Analysis of the Relationship Between Marx’s Philosophy and Hegel’s Philosophy from the Perspective of Property Rights——Centered on“Critique of Hegel’s Philosophy of Right”

作　　者：孙子豪 Sun Zihao(School of Marxism,Party School of the CPC Beijing Municipal Committee/Beijing Administration Institute,Beijing,100044)

机构地区：[1]中共北京市委党校(北京行政学院)马克思主义学院,北京100044

出　　处：《宁夏党校学报》2024年第4期43-50,共8页Journal of the Party School of the CPC Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region Committee

基　　金：国家社会科学基金青年项目“青年马克思政治哲学中的‘黑格尔因素’研究”(21CZX011)阶段性成果。

摘　　要：在《黑格尔法哲学批判》中,马克思与黑格尔的差异不仅表现在诸如市民社会与国家等社会政治问题的看法上,而且也表现在如何对待财产权等个体权利的态度上。在这一文本中,就财产权而言,马克思看似仅批判了《法哲学原理》“伦理”篇“国家”章中的财产权理论,但在论述过程中他其实也涉及了对“抽象法”篇中财产权理论的学习和对“伦理”篇“市民社会”章中财产权理论的改造。正是在学习、批判和改造的过程中,马克思完成了对黑格尔财产权理论的整体批判,并最终确立了他改造“市民社会”章中财产权理论的明确方向。不仅如此,这一整体批判也为马克思后来转向政治经济学批判研究打下了扎实的理论基础。In the“Critique of Hegel’s Philosophy of Right”,the differences between Marx and Hegel are not only evident in their views on socio-political issues such as civil society and the state,but also in their attitudes towards individual rights,including property rights.In this work,Marx appeared to critique only the property rights theory in the“Ethical Life”section of Hegel’s work“Elements of the Philosophy of Right,”specifically the chapter“The State”.However,in the discourse,Marx also engaged with the property rights theories presented in the“Abstract Right”sec⁃tion and adapts the theories from the“Civil Society”chapter in the“Ethical Life”section.Through the processes of studying,critiquing,and adapting these theories,Marx completed a comprehensive critique of Hegel’s property rights theory and ultimately establishes a clear direction for his revision of the property rights theory within the“Civil Society”chapter.Moreover,this comprehensive critique lays a solid theoretical foundation for Marx’s subsequent shift towards the critique of political economy.

关 键 词：《黑格尔法哲学批判》 财产权 个体权利 市民社会 

分 类 号：A811[哲学宗教—马克思主义哲学]