检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:刘豪龙 LIU Haolong(School of Law,Lanzhou University,Lanzhou Gansu 730000,China)
机构地区:[1]兰州大学法学院,兰州730000
出 处:《乐山师范学院学报》2024年第7期133-140,共8页Journal of Leshan Normal University
摘 要:在常规制度设计无法应对威胁国家生存的紧急危机时,为了最大程度地保障公共利益,以政府为代表的公权力主体权力范围扩大、个人权利相对克减,这本质上是国家进入紧急状态而行使国家紧急权力的逻辑结果。权力和权利是法理学研究的一对核心范畴,同时也是保障紧急危机治理在法治轨道上有序进行的本体支柱。国家紧急状态下与紧急危机治理有关的所有社会关系和社会问题实际上都是围绕权力和权利的关系展开的。从权力和权利的利益属性出发对国家紧急权力和个人权利的关系问题进行研究,不仅能够回应国家紧急状态下社会公众对公权力和私权利界限问题的关切,在法治原则和法治思维的基础上解决诸多社会问题,而且能够充实对该研究主题的整体性认识和精细化考量,为未来的相关研究提供明确而有效的创新思路。In order to protect the public interest to the greatest extent,the scope of the public power represented by the government is supposed to be expanded and the private rights are supposed to be relatively diminished when the conventional legal system cannot cope with the emergency crisis that threatens the existence of a nation,which is essentially the logical result of the condition of national emergency and the exercise of national emergency power.Power and right are a pair of core categories of jurisprudence research,and they are also the ontological pillars that ensure emergency crisis governance is carried out orderly on the track of rule of law.All the social relations and social problems associated with crisis governance under the state of national emergency are actually centered around the relationship between power and right.This research can not only respond to the public's concern about the boundary between public power and private rights,but also solve many social problems on the basis of the rule of law,and enrich the overall understanding and refined consideration of the research theme,providing clear and effective innovative ideas for future related research.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.144.206.193