检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:许欢 魏娜 吴佳正 Xu Huan;Wei Na;Wu Jiazheng(School of Social Governance and Development,Tsinghua University,Beijing,100084,China;School of Economics and Management,Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications,Beijing,100876,China;School of Economics and Management,Harbin Institute of Technology,Harbin,150001,China)
机构地区:[1]清华大学社会治理与发展研究院,北京100084 [2]北京邮电大学经济管理学院,北京100876 [3]哈尔滨工业大学经济与管理学院,哈尔滨150001
出 处:《公共管理学报》2024年第3期25-37,168,169,共15页Journal of Public Management
基 金:国家社科基金重大项目(21ZDA112);国家社科基金一般项目(20BGL278)。
摘 要:基层政府的信誉困境一直是中国地方治理的痛点和难点。尤其是近年来,各种基层治理的矛盾与冲突频频曝光,引发公众广泛热议,强化基层治理仍然任重而道远。本文以“提灯定损”事件为分析对象,通过构建“风险-危机-信任-治理”的分析框架,深入剖析在风险外溢、危机升级等多重压力下,基层政府信任流失的内在逻辑与行为路径,揭示了个案背后基层治理决策失误、能力短板、信任困境的深层症结。研究发现,不断累积的社会风险正在对基层治理形成系统性冲击,单一的科层制治理逻辑难以有效应对,亟需在法治、政治、道德三种逻辑中寻求交融共生、动态平衡。破解治理悖论的关键是厘清三种逻辑的边界,实现制度建构、政治互动、道德教化的有机统一。本文基于中国语境的理论探索,对于应对风险社会挑战、完善基层治理体系和提升治理能力具有一定启示意义。This article aims to conduct an in-depth analysis of the trust crisis faced by Chinese grassroots governments under the risk society based on the "Lamp-lit Damage Assessment" incident, and to explore how to break through the governance dilemma and reshape the credibility of grassroots governments. The study constructs a "risk-crisis-trust-governance" analytical framework to examine the internal logic and behavioral path of trust loss in grassroots governments under the pressures of risk spillover and crisis escalation. It em-ploys a qualitative case study approach, systematically analyzing the evolution trajectory of the "Lamp-lit Damage Assessment" incident from the stages of risk brewing, situation escalation, credibility collapse, and systematic reflection. The analysis reveals the deep-rooted problems behind the case, including decision-making errors, capacity shortfalls, and trust dilemmas in grassroots governance. It is found that the accumulating social risks are posing systemic shocks to grassroots governance, and the single logic of hierarchical governance struggles to cope effectively. There is an urgent need to seek convergence and dynamic balance among the three logics of rule of law, politics, and morality. The key to solving the governance paradox lies in clarifying the boundaries of the three logics and achieving an organic unity of institutional construction, political interaction,and moral education. The study focuses on a single case in the Chinese context, which may limit the generalizability of the findings to other contexts. Future research could expand the scope to include more cases and conduct comparative analyses across different regions and countries. And these findings offer practical insights for grassroots governments to enhance their risk governance capabilities and rebuild public trust. Specific strategies include deepening the reform of "delegating power, strengthening regulation, and improving services", fostering a risk-aware and proactive governance mindset, and building a grass
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.49