气候正义的可行性挑战与非理想理论建构  

Feasibility Challenge to Climate Justice and the Construction of Non-ideal Theory

作　　者：陈荑馨 CHEN Yi-xin(School of Philosophy,Faculty of Marxism,Northeast Normal University,Changchun 130024,China)

机构地区：[1]东北师范大学马克思主义学部哲学学院,长春130024

出　　处：《自然辩证法研究》2024年第6期24-29,共6页Studies in Dialectics of Nature

基　　金：国家社会科学基金重大项目“当代中国道德观念史与道德实践史研究”(20&ZD038)。

摘　　要：气候正义理论必须优先处理气候伦理与气候政治的关系问题。气候变化问题的现实性与紧迫性要求气候正义理论完成从理想的形而上学论证到非理想的政治规范性建构的方法论转向。对政治可行性的分析应成为气候正义理论的组成部分,但对政治可行性的描述性研究无法取代对规范性的证成,“应当蕴含能够”原则既为气候政治可行性限制的必要性提供了辩护,也规定了其伦理限度。通过整合实证性研究与规范性研究,气候正义非理想理论寻求道德上允许、政治上有效的理论路线,以循序渐进的方式来实现理想理论所指向的终极价值目标。A theory of climate justice must prioritize the relationship between climate ethics and climate politics.The reality and urgency of the climate change issue requires climate justice theory to complete a methodological shift from ideal metaphysical argument to non-ideal construction of political normativity.Analysis of political feasibility should be an integral part of climate justice theory,but descriptive studies of political feasibility are no substitute for the validation of political normativity,and the principle of “Ought Implies Can” both justifies the necessity of feasibility constraint from climate politics and imposes ethical limits on it.By integrating empirical and normative research,non-ideal theories of climate justice seek morally permissible and politically valid theoretical routes towards the ultimate value goal of ideal theory in a step-by-step manner.

关 键 词：气候正义 规范性 可行性限制 非理想理论 

分 类 号：N031[自然科学总论—科学技术哲学]