IPOM与Sublay术对腹壁切口疝的疗效与安全性分析  

Efficacy and safety of IPOM and Sublay in the treatment of abdominal incisional hernia

作　　者：柯瑞盛 吴雅琳 黄坤寨[1] 刘昭晖[1] 张福星[1] Ke Ruisheng;Wu Yalin;Huang Kunzhai;Liu Zhaohui;Zhang Fuxing(Department of General Surgery(Department of Thyroid and Hernia Surgery),the First Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen University,Xiamen 361001,Fujian Province,China)

机构地区：[1]厦门大学附属第一医院普外科(甲状腺疝外科),361001

出　　处：《中华疝和腹壁外科杂志（电子版）》2024年第3期258-261,共4页Chinese Journal of Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery(Electronic Edition)

基　　金：福建省自然科学基金项目卫生联合(青年创新)项目(2020J05299);厦门市医疗卫生指导性项目(3502Z20244ZD1022);福建省科技厅面上项目(2021J011343、2021J011352)。

摘　　要：腹壁切口疝是腹部手术后常见的并发症,手术是唯一有效的治疗方法。主流的腹壁切口疝的修补方式有腹腔内补片疝修补术(IPOM)和肌后筋膜前补片植入术(Sublay)。关于腹壁切口疝的IPOM和Sublay修补法(开放和完全腔镜下腹直肌后修补术)两类治疗方法的疗效,现争议比较多。本研究将进行文献综述,深入探讨分析IPOM术与Sublay术治疗腹壁切口疝的疗效与安全性。Abdominal incisional hernia is a common complication after abdominal surgery,and surgery is the only effective treatment.The mainstream repair methods of abdominal incisional hernia include the laparoscopic intraperitoneal onlay mesh(IPOM)and retromuscular prefascial mesh implantation(Sublay)repair.There are many disputes about the efficacy of IPOM and Sublay repair(open and totally endoscopic sublay repair)in the treatment of abdominal incisional hernia.This study will review the literature review,deeply explore and compare the efficacy and safety of IPOM and Sublay in the treatment of abdominal incisional hernia.

关 键 词：腹壁切口疝 腹腔内补片疝修补术 肌后筋膜前补片植入术 

分 类 号：R656.2[医药卫生—外科学]