检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:陈红民[1] 陈怡[2] Chen Hongmin;Chen Yi
机构地区:[1]浙江大学蒋介石与近代中国研究中心 [2]浙江大学历史学院
出 处:《台湾历史研究》2024年第3期19-31,共13页Taiwan History Studies
基 金:国家社科基金抗日战争研究专项工程项目“台湾民众抗日资料与数据库建设”(批准号:21KZD002)阶段性成果。
摘 要:抗战胜利后,协助接收台湾地区的美军联络组中校艾文思以职务之便侵占了属于中国的黄金。中方发现后提出引渡艾文思来华受审,为美方所拒绝。中方研判在当时的法律框架下由美方审理更为有利,同意移交美国审理此案。在美国法庭审理过程中,中方积极协助担任公诉人的检察官提供证据,但艾文思巧妙利用美国的陪审制度漏洞而逃脱惩罚。在国民党政权即将崩溃的背景之下,中方通过外交渠道重启审判的努力也无疾而终。本文运用档案资料揭示美国军人侵占中国黄金案件的经过、在美国法庭审理进程及结局,钩沉此一历史事件的真相。After the victory in the War of Resistance Against Japanese Aggression,Lieutenant Colonel Evans from the U.S.Military Liaison Group,who was assisting in the takeover of Taiwan region,exploited his position to seize gold that belonged to China.Upon discovery,the Chinese side requested the extradition of Evans to China for trial,which was refused by the U.S.side.After careful consideration,the Chinese authorities concluded that given the legal framework at the time,it would be more advantageous for the case to be tried in the United States and thus agreed to transfer it to U.S.jurisdiction.During the trial in the United States,the Chinese side actively assisted the prosecutor by providing evidence.However,Evans cleverly exploited loopholes in the American jury system and avoided punishment.Amidst the backdrop of the Kuomintang regime's impending collapse,efforts to reopen the case through diplomatic channels ultimately failed.This paper draws on archival materials to reveal the details of the case involving the U.S.military officer's theft of Chinese gold,the trial process in the U.S.court,and the outcome,shedding light on the truth of this historical event.
分 类 号:D822.371.2[政治法律—政治学] D618[政治法律—外交学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.57