印度构建封闭性海洋防务体系的多维实践  

India's Multidimensional Endeavors for Building an Exclusive Maritime Defense System

作　　者：刘鹏 王静 Liu Peng;Wang Jing

机构地区：[1]云南大学“一带一路”研究院和国际关系研究院

出　　处：《现代国际关系》2024年第7期62-78,135,共18页

基　　金：国家社科基金一般项目“美印日澳四国机制的实体化与扩大化及其对华影响研究”(项目编号21BGJ006)的中期成果。

摘　　要：印度在外交上长期谋求在印度洋区域的霸主地位。为了实现这一目标,印度在印度洋区域主导构建了6个安全机制,借以打造可由其掌控的封闭性防务体系,充当规则的制定者和维护者,并利用当前对其有利的国际环境和红海危机,提升其作为印度洋“警察”的军事投射能力,对他国实行规则拒止。印度建立封闭性海洋防务体系的实践既是其地区霸权主义落地的需要,也是印、美“印太战略”求同存异、相互调适的结果,是美国维持全球霸权和印度追求印度洋霸权的暂时交汇,但以“规则”之名行霸权之实的防务体系并未增加区域公共安全产品的供给,反而加剧了地缘政治博弈和域内中小国家的生存困境,预示着这种封闭性防务体系因为缺乏包容性和共同安全而难以成功。Establishing and maintaining dominance in the Indian Ocean is the long-term policy pursuit of India.In order to better achieve its goals,India has taken the lead in building 6 maritime security regimes in the Indian Ocean as the basis of its system.It strives to create a closed defense system led by it in the Indian Ocean,become the rule maker and enforcer,and use the current favorable international environment and the Red Sea crisis after the Palestinian-Israeli conflict to enhance its military capabilities as the "policeman"of the Indian Ocean and its ability to deny access of other countries by using rules and international regime.The closed Indian Ocean defense regimes are the results of the escalation of India's regional hegemonyand the compromise of the United States and India's "Indo-Pacific Strategy,"they both serve the global hegemony of the US regional hegemony of India.The regimes do not lead to the increase of public goods in terms of security,but lead to the deterioration of small and medium countries in this region and intensifying arms race.The closed defense regime does not generate shared security and will fail eventually.

关 键 词：印度 南亚次大陆 地区霸权主义 国际机制 海洋安全 

分 类 号：D835.1[政治法律—政治学]