检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:章鉴港 ZHANG Jiangang(Institute of Economic Law,Zhejiang Sci-Tech University,310000,Hangzhou,Zhejiang,China)
机构地区:[1]浙江理工大学经济法研究所,浙江杭州310000
出 处:《特区经济》2024年第7期17-21,共5页Special Zone Economy
摘 要:从10例判决赔偿的案件来看,我国反垄断案件的判决赔偿额过低,原因在于:一是单独适用补偿性赔偿,二是未考虑一般提价类行为的利润损失,三是缺少判决前利息的计算。传统的损害赔偿制度基本上是惩罚性赔偿或补偿性赔偿的单层次适用,存在局限性。实践中存在着惩罚性赔偿制度的改进、补偿性赔偿制度的进化两条革新路径,但仍有不足。我国反垄断损害赔偿制度应从单层次的补偿性赔偿转向惩罚性赔偿和补偿性赔偿相结合,针对不同类型行为构建分层适用的损害赔偿制度。Judging from the 10 cases in which compensation was awarded,The reasons for the low amount of damages awarded in China’s antitrust cases are:The first is that the sole application of compensatory compensation;The second is not to consider the loss of profits caused by the general price-rising behavior;The third is the lack of calculation of pre-judgment interest.The traditional damage system is basically a singlelevel application of punitive or compensatory compensation,which has limitations.There are two innovation path that is the improment of the punitive damages and the evolution of the compensatory damages in the practice,but still problems.The system of antitrust damages in China should be changed from the single-level compensatory damages to the combination of punitive and compensatory system,and the multi-level antitrust compensation system should be constructed for different types of behaviors.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.144.84.11