在论诗与论理之间《:朱子语类》论诗的话语意义  

Between Poetry and Principle:Discourse Meaning of Discussion on Poem in Classified Conversations of ZHU Xi

作　　者：刘思宇[1,2] LIU Si-yu

机构地区：[1]北京师范大学文学院,北京100875 [2]北京师范大学文艺学研究中心,北京100875

出　　处：《求是学刊》2024年第3期150-159,共10页Seeking Truth

基　　金：国家社科基金重大项目“语录类文献整理与儒家话语体系建构及传承的研究”(20&ZD265);国家社科基金青年项目“理学语境中诗的话语力量以及朱子诗的美学境界赏析”(18CZW002)。

摘　　要：《朱子语类》论诗有其独特面貌,朱熹有意选取语录体诗话的方式进行言说,着意呈现诗歌创作中面向生活审美的浑融气象,在论诗观念上体现出诗话语境下诗与理的互斥互塑,并在此基础上着力推崇豪壮诗风,体现出朱熹系统性的审美观念和话语策略。康德对崇高审美的分析将朱熹原本诉诸审美经验和直觉体悟的文本呈现进行理性化理解,合理解释了为何朱熹所推崇的豪壮诗风较之其他风格更能体现“近道气象”,更为具体地揭示出朱熹理想诗风的重要特点。《朱子语类》论诗不仅体现出朱熹不同于一般理学家的审美修养,更是系统地体现出他在审美层面对体道方式的根本性探索及其对此种话语方式之于体道意义的自觉。The discourse on poetry in Classified Conversations of ZHU Xi exhibits a unique facet wherein ZHU Xi deliberately adopts a dialogic form for discussing poetry,aiming to highlight an integrated aesthetic of life in poetic creation.This text reveals the dialectical relationship between poetry and rational principle within the context of poetic discourse,advocating a vigorous and grand style of poetry that reflects ZHU Xi’s system⁃atic aesthetic ideals and discursive strategies.Kant’s analysis of the sublime provides a rational interpretation of ZHU’s text,originally grounded in aesthetic experience and intuitive understanding,offering a cogent expla⁃nation as to why ZHU’s preferred grand style more effectively embodies the close-to-Tao aesthetic,while also elucidating the significant features of ZHU’s ideal poetic style.The discussion on poem in Classified Conversa⁃tions of ZHU Xi not only showcases his aesthetic refinement,distinguishing him from typical Neo-Confucian scholars,but also systematically exposes his profound exploration of aesthetic methods and his conscious engagement with the discursive practices essential for embodying the Tao.

关 键 词：朱熹 《朱子语类》 诗话 审美 

分 类 号：I207.22[文学—中国文学]