检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:陈曦宜 CHEN Xiyi(Koguan School of Law,Shanghai Jiao Tong University,Shanghai 200030,China)
出 处:《现代法学》2024年第4期192-208,共17页Modern Law Science
摘 要:夫妻忠诚协议的法律效力之争背后是三点预设:家庭关系与合同模式存在错位;协议财产属性的弱伦理性与人身属性的强伦理性相互对立;法律强制与情感关系不相匹配。三点预设使得效力之争徘徊于个人本位—家庭本位两造之间而久无定论。“关系法理”以关系契约理论实现了婚姻与合同关系的沟通,为忠诚协议参照适用合同编提供依据。对关系结构的强调,使得人身与财产关系背后共同的伦理属性得以揭示。“关系性解纷”关注关系事实本身,而非仅仅协议文本;以维护良性关系、阻却恶性关系而非规制个人为目标;以“关系性自主”而非“个人真意表示”为效力前提;以“关系性善”而非“个人利益”为价值基础。忠诚协议可区分为“规范型协议”和“累积型协议”,并根据解纷需求适用审判程序和调解程序。最终,法律对情感关系的态度既非以力有不逮为由的回避,也非家长主义式干预,而是一种有效回应和反馈式调整。There are three presuppositions underlying the dispute over legal validity of spousal fidelity agreements:the misalignment between the family relationship and the contractual model,the opposition between the weak ethical nature of property attributes and the strong ethical nature of personal attributes,and the mismatch between the legal compulsion and the emotional relationship.The three presuppositions are based on the tension of individual-family dualism,and the validity of fidelity agreements is undecided as a result.However,the relational jurisprudence breaks existing presuppositions.The relational contracts theory realizes the connection between marriage and the contract model,which provides a basis for fidelity agreements’reference to the contract law.The emphasis on the relational structure reveals the common ethical nature behind personal and property relationships.The“relational dispute resolution”focuses on the fact of the relationship itself,not just the text of the agreement.The judicial goal is to maintain virtuous relationships and discourage vicious relationships,not to regulate individuals.The premise of agreement validity is“relational autonomy”rather than“individual expression of intent”.The value basis is“relational goods”rather than“individual interests”.On that basis,fidelity agreements can be categorized as“normative agreement”and“cumulative agreement”.And the litigation procedure and the mediation procedure are applied according to the dispute resolution requirements.Thus the judicial attitudes towards emotional relationships will neither be incompetent avoidance nor paternalistic intervention,but an effective response and feedback adjustment.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.49