共同富裕借以实现的分配制度——与蔡继明教授商榷“西方要素分配论”观点  

The Distribution System for Realizing Common Wealth--Discussing with Cai Jiming on“Western Factor Distribution Theory”

作　　者：谭泓[1] Tan Hong

机构地区：[1]青岛大学劳动人事研究院

出　　处：《政治经济学研究》2024年第2期107-115,共9页Chinese Journal of Political Economics

基　　金：国家社科基金“劳动伦理嵌入劳动关系治理的文化社会学研究”(20BSH093)的阶段性成果。

摘　　要：共同富裕借以实现的分配制度,只能是按劳分配为主体,并随着生产力日益发达,逐步扩大按需分配的成分。蔡继明先生基于广义价值论的按生产要素贡献分配理论,“为保护私有财产”而尽心竭力,却忽视了坚持“人民至上”的马克思主义理论观,尤其是在学术研究过程中始终存在“遗漏或偷换概念”的缺陷,使“按生产要素贡献分配理论”呈现三个根本性错误:第一,违背《中华人民共和国宪法》确定的“按劳分配为主体”前提下的“多种分配方式并存”;第二,背离马克思“劳动价值论”和“剩余价值论”;第三,忽视劳动要素分配的消费性与非劳动要素分配的几何式增长。因此,一定程度上背离了共同富裕的社会主义本质。The distribution system for realizing the common wealth should be based on the distribution of labor as the main body.With the increasing development of the productive forces,the system can expand gradually the component of distribution according to need.Cai Jiming's efforts to“protect private property”base on the theory of distribution according to the contribution of factors of production in the broad sense of the theory of value,while he ignores the Marxist theoretical view of“adhering to the people first”.In particular,the fatal flaw of“omitting or substituting concepts”exists in the process of his academic research,which leads to three fundamental errors in the theory of“participation in distribution according to the contribution of factors of production”:firstly,contrary to the“coexistence of various forms of distribution”under the premise of“distribution according to labor as the mainstay”as determined by the Constitution;secondly,deviating from Marx's“labor theory of value”and“theory of surplus value”,thirdly,neglecting the consumptive nature of the distribution of labor factors and the geometric growth of the distribution of non-labor factors.Thus,his theory fundamentally deviates from the socialist essence of common wealth.

关 键 词：共同富裕 分配制度 按劳动分配为主体 按生产要素贡献分配 

分 类 号：F124[经济管理—世界经济]