帝国主义理论在中国的再阐释——以瞿秋白为线索  

Reinterpretation of Imperialism in China: Following the Lead of Qu Qiubai

作　　者：路卡 Luka Golez(Tsinghua Institute for Advanced Study in Humanities and Social Sciences)

机构地区：[1]清华大学人文与社会科学高等研究所

出　　处：《开放时代》2024年第4期96-108,M0006,共14页Open Times

摘　　要：帝国主义问题在20世纪共产主义运动的理论脉络中扮演了重要的角色。这类命题在马克思主义思想领域开辟了新的批评视域,也直接促使共产主义运动从一场源于西欧的工人运动扩展为全球范围的革命实践。中国语境中的帝国主义问题是中国共产党革命实践中的关键话题,而瞿秋白对其做了开创性的贡献。重新检视瞿秋白在20世纪20年代初期所参与的两次论争,有助于我们追溯帝国主义理论在中国的传播和再阐释过程。瞿秋白通过调动第三国际语境中的帝国主义理论,对中国的半殖民地处境展开了深入的阐释,从危机的社会形态、畸形政治经济关系与国际依附地位等多重层面,论证了帝国主义时代中国的客体性,同时将相关的理论探析延伸到中国应如何超越其客体地位的革命政治构想上。The question of imperialism played a very important role in the theoretical development of the communist movement in the 20th century. Such a topic opened up new critical horizons in the field of Marxist thought,and directly contributed to the expansion of the communist movement from a workers' campaign originating in Western Europe to a revolutionary practice on a global scale. The question of imperialism in the Chinese context was a key topic in the revolutionary practice of the Chinese Communist Party, and Qu Qiubai made a pioneering contribution to it. A re-examination of the two controversies in which Qu Qiubai participated in the early twenties of the twentieth century would give us some insights into the proliferation and reinterpretation of imperialist theories in China. By applying the theory of imperialism in the context of the Communist International, Qu Qiubai developed an in-depth explanation of China's semi-colonial situation. On multiple levels such as the social form of crisis, deformed political and economic relations, international dependency, etc., he demonstrated the“objectification”of China in the era of imperialism. He then extended the relevant theoretical analysis to his own revolutionary political conception of how China should go beyond its status as a passive object.

关 键 词：瞿秋白 第三国际 帝国主义 民族解放运动 

分 类 号：D231[政治法律—政治学] A81[政治法律—中共党史]