方回别集新考  

A New Textual Research on the Collected Works of Fang Hui

作　　者：魏崇武 Wei Chongwu

机构地区：[1]北京师范大学文学院

出　　处：《励耘学刊》2024年第1期275-303,M0011,M0012,共31页

基　　金：全国高校古委会规划项目“方回诗文集编年校注”,项目编号:1307。

摘　　要：元人方回诸种别集存在不少疑团,学界对此虽有不少研究,但颇有相互矛盾之处。经考证,所谓《碧流集》集名不正确,“碧”应作“璧”;已佚原本《桐江集》应有诗有文,而非如有些学者所说的纯诗集;存本《桐江集》与已佚之原本《桐江集》名同实异,其收文主要来源应包括《璧流集》的逸文、原本《桐江集》的残本和未及编入《桐江续集》的待编文稿;无论是重编为三十六卷的《四库全书》本,还是仅略作调序就著录为四十八卷存三十六卷的诸种清抄本,都改变了元刊本《桐江续集》原貌;学界此前未尝注意到的赵节本虽已佚,但通过《新安文献志》尚可略窥一斑。《新安文献志》不仅有重要的辑佚价值,对于探讨方回别集相关问题也颇有帮助。至于《虚谷集》,笔者倾向于认为其未曾存在过。There are many doubts about the various collections of Fang Hui in the Yuan Dynasty,and although there has been a lot of research in this field,there are quite conflicting aspects.Through research,the title of the collection Biliu Collection is incorrect,and“碧”should be used as“壁”;The original Tongjiang Collection that has been lost should have poetry and prose,rather than the pure poetry collection that some scholars claim;The preserved version of Tongjiang Collection is not identical to the lost original Tongjiang Collection in name and substance.Its main sources of collection should include excerpts from Biliu Collection,remnants of the original Tongjiang Collection,and unfinished manuscripts that were not included in the Tongjiang Continuum;Both the Siku Quanshu,which was reorganized into 36 volumes,and the various Qing Dynasty manuscripts,which were only briefly indexed and described as 48 volumes and stored in 36 volumes,have changed the original appearance of the Yuan edition Tongjiang Continuum;Although the Zhao's abridged edition,which was previously unnoticed by the academic community,has been lost,it can still be glimpsed through the Records of Xin'an Literature.The Records of Xin'an Literature not only has important lost value,but also is very helpful for exploring issues related to the collection of Fang Hui.As for the Xugu Collection,the author tends to believe that it did not exist.

关 键 词：方回 《璧流集》 《桐江集》 《桐江续集》 《虚谷集》 赵节本 

分 类 号：I206.2[文学—中国文学]