检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:何静 HE Jing
机构地区:[1]北京师范大学法学院
出 处:《河北法律职业教育》2024年第5期53-61,共9页HEBEI VOCATIONAL EDUCATION OF LAW
基 金:2023年度北京师范大学法学院学术型研究生专项科研基金课题“个人信息保护检察公益诉讼制度研究”(2023LAW003)。
摘 要:《个人信息保护法》为个人信息保护提供了检察公益诉讼的新路径。实践证明,检察公益诉讼在个人信息保护领域发挥了一定作用,但同样也存在案件范围相对固定、程序与实体规则尚有欠缺、可能存在救济不足等问题。因而,为实现个人信息的长效保护,可通过拓宽案件范围、完善法律制度供给、完善个人信息保护预防性治理等方面加强检察公益诉讼制度;同时通过明确可提起公益诉讼的社会组织、赋予社会组织提起行政公益诉讼资格、社会组织支持检察院起诉等措施协同发展社会公益诉讼;最后,可尝试建立个人信息保护领域公民诉讼制度,以此形成个人信息多主体保护合力。The Personal Information Protection Law provides a new path for prosecutorial public interest litigation in protecting personal information.The practice has proven that prosecutorial public interest litigation has played a certain role in the field of personal information protection.But it also has problems,such as the relatively fixed scope of cases,the lack of procedural and substantive rules,and the possibility of insufficient remedies.Therefore,in order to achieve long-term protection of personal information,the procuratorial public interest litigation system can be strengthened by expanding the scope of cases,improving the supply of legal systems,and improving preventive governance of personal information protection.At the same time,social public interest litigation is developed through coordinated development of measures such as clarifying the social organizations that can file public interest litigation,empowering social organizations to file administrative public interest litigation,and supporting the procuratorate to prosecute by social organizations.Finally,attempting to establish a citizensuit system in the field of personal information protection.In theseways,we can form a joint force of multiple parties in the protectionof personal information.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.49