检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:郭炎[1,2] 杜汝旭 叶睿 袁奇峰 项振海[5] Guo Yan;Du Ruxu;Ye Rui;Yuan Qifeng;Xiang Zhenhai(School of Urban Design,Wuhan University,Wuhan 430072,China;Research Center for Hubei Habitat Environmental Engineering&Technology,Wuhan 430072,China;Guangzhou Urban Renewal Land Preparation and Guarantee Center,Guangzhou 510055,China;School of Architecture,South China University of Technology,Guangzhou 510641,China;Faculty of Architecture and City Planning,Kunming University of Science and Technology,Kunming 650050,China)
机构地区:[1]武汉大学城市设计学院,武汉430072 [2]湖北省人居环境工程技术研究中心,武汉430072 [3]广州市城市更新土地整备保障中心,广州510055 [4]华南理工大学建筑学院,广州510641 [5]昆明理工大学建筑与城市规划学院,昆明650500
出 处:《热带地理》2024年第8期1400-1409,共10页Tropical Geography
基 金:国家自然科学基金(41971185、52378074);国家社科基金重大项目(23&ZD114)。
摘 要:集体建设用地再开发是盘活存量,促进城市高质量发展的主要途径,伴随着集体土地产权制度路径依赖式的变迁:自上而下的土地确权正式化集体建设用地的存在,赋予村集体权利,但在土地初次开发中自下而上形成的制度制约着改造。文章探讨制度变迁下,地方政府如何与村集体互动,化解上述制度制约,促进集体建设用地市场化改造的。研究发现,集体建设用地正式化开启了改造市场,但仍受空间破碎、集体土地经营内卷化、开发权模糊的约束。地方政府发挥了企业化的非正式角色,与村集体形成合作与竞争并存的协商型合作关系。合作在于政府从供、需两侧化解前述制约,充当村集体与市场主体间的“交易中介”,降低交易成本,助力改造。竞争表现为村集体为攫取地租把持政府,损害社会公平。地方政府的“非正式”角色应予以制度化,以规避其在维护社会公益上的失灵。After decades of rapid urban expansion,China's urban development has transitioned to focus on the quality improvement of existing spaces.Urban renewal is now a strategic measure crucial for advancing highlevel territorial spatial planning and intensive land use.In coastal regions that have experienced rapid urbanization,redeveloping underutilized collective construction land is essential for achieving high-quality urban development.China has experienced a path-dependent institutional change in collective land property rights,typically village-based institutions created by rural collectives.When the government aims to grant legal status to collective construction land by redefining property rights and promoting redevelopment,these informal institutions inevitably pose constraints.This study conducts a theoretical and empirical analysis of the roles,behaviors,and outcomes of local governments in constructing a collective land redevelopment market.First,it explores the relationship between the government and the market under gradual institutional change and how this relationship manifests in the redevelopment of collective construction land.Then,it empirically examines the case of Nanhai District in Foshan City,using data from the "Three Olds Reconstruction" database and a redevelopment project with which the authors are deeply involved.The study investigates the formation mechanisms of collective construction land,changes in land development institutions,constraints on redevelopment,and measures taken by local governments to construct the land redevelopment market.Despite the government's efforts to legitimize collective construction land through titling and market initiation,issues such as land fragmentation,involution of collective land management,and ambiguity in property rights persist,constraining further redevelopment.Local governments play an entrepreneurial role characterized by a negotiated relationship of both cooperation and competition with village collectives,the property rights holders.Cooperation inv
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.149.230.241