MR诊断膝关节内、外侧半月板后根部撕裂的临床价值探究  

The Clinical Value of MR In the Diagnosis of Posterior Root Tear of Medial and Lateral Meniscus of Knee Joint

作　　者：王金倩 WANG Jinqian(Jianchang county people's hospital,Huludao,Liaoning 125300)

机构地区：[1]建昌县人民医院,辽宁葫芦岛125300

出　　处：《中国伤残医学》2024年第8期27-30,共4页Chinese Journal of Trauma and Disability Medicine

摘　　要：目的:分析膝关节内、外侧半月板后根部撕裂选择磁共振(MR)诊断的临床价值.方法:选择本院2019年6月—2021年6月收治的87例膝关节半月板损伤患者为研究对象.患者均接受MR及关节镜检查,并将关节镜检查结果作为依据,判断MR检查的准确度、特异度和灵敏度.结果:MR检查准确度与膝关节镜比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);MR临床诊断准确率高于膝关节镜,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);MR的的特异性与灵敏度高于膝关节镜,组间差异有统计学意义(P<0.05).结论:膝关节内侧和外侧半月板后跟撕裂患者选择MR检查可获得准确诊断结果,能够为临床诊治工作提供更为准确及全面的依据,临床应用价值显著.Objective:The clinical value of magnetic resonance(MR)in diagnosing posterior root tears of the medial and lateral meniscus of the knee joint.Methods:87 patients with knee meniscus injury admitted to our hospital from June 2019 to June 2021 were selected as the research subjects.All patients underwent MR and arthroscopy examinations,and the accuracy,specificity,and sensitivity of the MR examination were determined based on the results of the arthroscopy examination.Results:Comparison of accuracy of MR examination with knee arthroscopy,the difference was not statistically significant(P>0.05).The clinical diagnostic accuracy of MR is higher than that of knee arthroscopy,the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).The specificity and sensitivity of MR are higher than those of knee arthroscopy,the differences between groups were statistically significant(P<0.05).Conclusion:Patients with medial and lateral meniscus heel tears of the knee joint can obtain accurate diagnostic results by choosing MR examination,which can provide more accurate and comprehensive basis for clinical diagnosis and treatment.The clinical application value is significant worthy of promotion and application.

关 键 词：后根部撕裂 磁共振 膝关节 半月板 

分 类 号：R684[医药卫生—骨科学]