招标控制价准确性法律责任分析  

Analysis of Legal Responsibility for Accuracy of Regulated Maximum Bidding Price

作　　者：刘鲁明[1] Liu Lu-ming(Shandong University of Technology,Zibo 255000,Shandong Province,China)

机构地区：[1]山东理工大学,山东淄博255000

出　　处：《建筑与装饰》2024年第15期34-36,共3页Construction & Decoration

摘　　要：越来越多的招标控制价在工程项目招标文件中作为评标基准价而被写入评标标准,由此导致工程结算时因为招标控制价准确性问题而产生价款争议,在相关法律和规范中缺少解决此类争议条款的情况下,采用历史研究法,对定额计价沿革和清单计价的演变进行梳理,在此基础上找到并运用适当的法律原则,结合计价规范的具体规定解决了争议。此研究是对清单计价制度的积极探索,能促进清单计价的顺利实施。Regulated maximum bidding price is increasingly included into tender evaluation criteria as the tender evaluation benchmark price in the bidding documents of engineering projects,which leads to price disputes due to the accuracy problem of regulated maximum bidding price in the project settlement.In the condition of no clauses to resolve such disputes in the relevant laws and norms,the historical research method is used to sort out the evolution of fixed rate pricing and the evolution of list valuation.On this basis,appropriate legal principles are found and applied to solve the disputes in combination with the specific provisions of the pricing specifications.This study is an active exploration of the list valuation system,which can promote the smooth implementation of list valuation.

关 键 词：清单计价 国家定额 企业定额 招标控制价 法律原则 

分 类 号：D92[政治法律—法学]