生成式人工智能治理的经济法逻辑  

The Logic of Economic Law’s Governance on Generative Artificial Intelligence

作　　者：董新凯[1] Dong Xinkai(Intellectual Property College,Nanjing University of Science and Technology,Nanjing Jiangsu210094)

机构地区：[1]南京理工大学知识产权学院,江苏南京210094

出　　处：《山东师范大学学报（社会科学版）》2024年第3期95-109,共15页Journal of Shandong Normal University(Social Sciences)

基　　金：江苏高校哲学社会科学研究重大项目“竞争法视阈下的知识产权信用治理研究”(2020SJZDA093)的阶段性成果。

摘　　要：在广受关注的生成式人工智能领域,各主要国家正在加强经济法治理,我国在该领域的经济法治理还未得到足够重视,并存在多方面问题。经济法的双重功能及其体系构造决定了它在生成式人工智能治理上具有不可替代的作用,围绕生成式人工智能的国际规则竞争尤其需要经济法发挥作用。经济法对生成式人工智能的治理应当促进发展与安全的融合,注重系统治理,加强事前防范与事后回应相结合、专项规则供给与一般规则适用相结合。宏观调控法和市场规制法应当基于各自优势在生成式人工智能治理中发挥相应作用;考虑到生成式人工智能在不同阶段的复杂情形,经济法治理应当分段进行、区别对待。为了使经济法治理更加精准、更具效率,需要科学构建生成式人工智能风险评价机制。The governance of generative artificial intelligence(AI) has gained widespread attention globally, with major countries strengthening economic legal frameworks in this field. However, China's governance of economic law in this domain has yet to receive adequate focus, and there exist multiple problems. The dual functions and unique system structure of economic law determine its indispensable role in governing artificial intelligence generated content(AIGC), especially on the competitions on international regulations related to this kind of AI. Effective economic law governance over AIGC should prioritize the fusion of development and security, emphasize systematic governance, and integrate proactive prevention with responsive measures alongside a mix of specialized and general regulatory rules. Leveraging the advantages of macroeconomic regulation and control laws and market regulation laws is essential in governing AIGC, adapting strategies to the varying complexities across different stages. In order to enhance the precision and efficiency of economic law governance, the establishment of a scientifically sound risk assessment mechanism for AIGC is imperative.

关 键 词：生成式人工智能 经济法治理 宏观调控法 市场规制法 风险评价 

分 类 号：D91[政治法律—法学]