仲裁费收取及管理模式比较研究  

A Comparative Study of the Collection and Management Mode for Arbitration Fee

作　　者：宋连斌[1] 姚迪 杨昆波 陶祉霖 Song Lianbin;Yao Di;Yang Kunbo;Tao Zhilin

机构地区：[1]中国政法大学国际法学院 [2]北京仲裁委员会/京国际仲裁中心 [3]北京金诚同达(深圳)律师事务所

出　　处：《仲裁研究》2023年第1期1-13,共13页Arbitration Study

摘　　要：近年来,中国仲裁飞速发展,我国仲裁服务市场竞争日益激烈,仲裁机构对于跳出“收支两条线”的财政管理模式、“去行政化”实行企业化管理、顺应市场经济的发展规律完善改革仲裁委员会内部治理结构的诉求十分强烈。仲裁费用制度在国际仲裁界已有相对而言较为成熟的做法,但却是我国仲裁界函待突破的“瓶颈”。在打造多元化争议解决机制的大潮下,不少国内仲裁机构修订仲裁规则、改造机构管理模式,不断提升自身实力。本文对我国仲裁机构仲裁费收取及管理模式概况进行梳理,并对国内与国际仲裁机构收费及管理模式进行比较研究,以期对我国仲裁机构收费及管理制度改革有所神益。During recent years,arbitration in China has developed rapidly,and the competition in China's arbitration service market has become increasingly fierce.Arbitration institutions have a strong demand for jumping out of the financial management model of"two lines of income and expenditure","de-administration"to implement enterprise management,and improving gand reforming the internal governance structure of the arbitration commissions in accordance with the development rule of market economy.The arbitration fee system has a relatively mature practice in international arbitration community,but it is a bottleneck that China's arbitration community needs to break through urgently.Under the tide of building a diversified dispute resolution mechanism,many domestic arbitration institutions have revised arbitration rules,transformed their management models,and continuously improved their own strength.This paper will sort out the overview of the arbitration fee charging and management model of arbitration institutions in China,and conduct a comparative study on the fee charging and management models between domestic and international arbitration institutions,so as to benefit the reform of the fee charging and management system of arbitration institutions in China.

关 键 词：仲裁费用 仲裁员报酬 机构费用 

分 类 号：D92[政治法律—法学]