检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:吴咸亮 梁勤勤 Wu Xianliang;Liang Qinqin
机构地区:[1]上海至合律师事务所 [2]安徽吴咸亮律师事务所
出 处:《仲裁研究》2023年第1期26-35,共10页Arbitration Study
摘 要:由于仲裁制度自有的自治性和保密性特点,常有仲裁当事人虚假仲裁或恶意仲裁侵害案外人利益的情形发生,而案外人因无法参与其中往往并不知晓或者即便知晓也无法通过事前或事中的救济方式阻却侵害结果的发生,导致案外人缺乏有效救济途径。为了更有效地解决虚假仲裁问题、进一步维护案外人合法权益,本文将对现有的案外人可能存在的救济措施进行评述分析,并以民事诉讼中第三人撤销之诉制度为基础,探寻建立案外人撤销仲裁裁决之诉的架构模式。Due to the autonomy and confidentiality of the arbitration system,there are often cases in which the parties involved in arbitration falsely or maliciously infringe upon the interests of outsiders of the case.However,because outsiders cannot participate in the arbitration,they often do not know about it or even if they do,they cannot prevent the result of the infringement by means of relief in advance or in the event,leading to the lack of effective relief channels for outsiders of the case.In order to solve the problem of false arbitration more effectively and further safeguard the legitimate rights and interests of an outsider,this context will make a comment and analysis on the existing possible relief measures of an outsider,and on the basis of the third party's cancellation of the lawsuit,explore the establishment of the framework mode of an outsider's cancellation of the arbitration award.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.200