国际商事争议解决的“仲调结合”中立者身份问题  

On the Issue of the Neutral of Med-Arb in International Commercial Disputes Settlement

作　　者：张辉 田謄杞[1] Zhang Hui;Tian Tengqi

机构地区：[1]武汉大学国际法研究所 [2]武汉大学法学院

出　　处：《仲裁研究》2023年第1期36-44,共9页Arbitration Study

基　　金：2020年度国家社科基金重点项目“国家安全视域下中国涉外经贸法律规则体系完善研究”(20AZD053)。

摘　　要：“仲裁与调解结合”具有多种形式,其中中立者身份的区分问题在实践中一直争议不断,而需要区分中立者的身份主要存在于调解程序在先的情形中。当事人寻求将仲裁与调解结合解决其国际商事争议,既要追求争议解决效果符合各自的预期,也在寻求更为公平公正且便捷高效的方式。虽然意思自治在非诉讼方式解决争议中起到较大作用,但区分中立者在不同程序中的身份是实现争议解决程序公正的首要前提。要使中立者的身份在不同程序中相互分离,在仲裁及调解的相关制度完善中,如果是在同一机构内处理争议可以区分人员,也可以通过跨机构的合作从实质上进行区分。Recently there have been several forms in the combination of mediation and arbitration,in which the issue of the status of the neutral of Med-Arb process is being discussed in practice continuously.The status of the neutral should be distinguished when the procedure of mediation precedes the arbitration.The parties who adapt Med-Arb to solve their international commercial disputes pursue not only the effects of dispute solving in accordance with their expectation,but also the methods with fair,equitable,convenient and efficient settlement.Although the autonomy of all the parties plays an essential role in dispute solving,distinguishing the status of the neutral in Med-Arb is the precondition to guarantee the procedural justice.To make distinction of the status of the neutral in subsequent legal framework refining,the personnel in the same institute should be different,or different institutes could cooperate to cope with disputes,which is an approach of substantial distinction.

关 键 词：仲调结合 中立者 意思自治 程序公正 

分 类 号：D92[政治法律—法学]